|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
I agree with all your comments. Here are better clouds and some little shadows. Shadows are hard to do because there is no actual image to copy with photoshop and the generated image has to be the same in L and R images. |
Dec 16th |
 |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Another good phontogram of the cat just setting on my desktop. |
Dec 8th |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
I have a bit of trouble also seeing the statue in the back. It seems to have some vertical shift. Was this a cha-cha image? Otherwise, the child is in good focus and the gray tone of the statue lends to the religious setting. |
Dec 8th |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Before I looked at it in 3D, my first thought was SO... and what is that Squair thing behind the trees. Then in 3D I saw the crop duster and the dusting powder. Good to get one good shot, but it might have been better with the airplane a bit more up in the sky. A pilot would have to really enjoy flying to fly that close to the ground and miss the buildings and power lines. Interesting image. |
Dec 8th |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Interesting green and yellow fields. I grew up near that area. the tractor trails do grab the view, but it seems a little tipped down on the left - but maybe that is the way it is. |
Dec 8th |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Very interesting 3D process and a VERY colorful hypnotic portrait. Do you really have one eye green and the other red? (<: |
Dec 8th |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Comment |
Very interesting image, good color and fine detail in the woman. Inter it again. I have had a particular image place 1st in one exhibition and not even get accepted in another. Some groups and judges are very particular about the disparity of an image. Even with the woman at the screen level, the tree in the background is separated by about 1/8 the image width. A disparity of 8. This can be viewed easily on a small screen or as a card, but when it is projected on a big 3D TV this low disparity is annoying. Some say the disparity ought to be about 20-30 for viewing on a big screen. I once had an image of an altered reality toadstool and it was considered by PSA for 3D image of the year. They sent the image to me and said if I could reduce the background disparity, they would consider it. I tried, but I gave up and the image was not considered. I also think that the images judged just before your image has a slight influence on your score - but they try to randomize the images to minimize this affect. So much for my thoughts. |
Dec 8th |
| 68 |
Dec 22 |
Reply |
Yes, you're right. It was late when I quit combining the two images and I just sent it. I was working on getting the girls to look like they were standing on the sand. I'll have to fix the clouds and upload a better version. As I look at it now, there's something amiss on the back of the dragon also. |
Dec 8th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 68
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|