|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Reply |
I see what you mean. Obviously, the dog image didn't change in the 3D view. I think it is one's automatic adjustment of a visual image to make things closer to us look smaller because we know they are closer. I guess that makes the dog look thinner. |
Mar 27th |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Reply |
This was a very simple image to convert. The wall was easy as it is flat and I just adjusted the size a bit around MacKenna so it looked 3D. Most of parts of MacKenna were just shifted a tad so her one leg and arms were obvious 3D. I think I made her head a bit in front of her body also. (all in Photoshop) |
Mar 27th |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Steve, I guess I ought to know where the "Dam Square" and "Monument" are, but I don't. US? Great Britten? somewhere else? It is an interesting wet night image with lots of people. |
Mar 12th |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Reply |
Betty, Here is a view or your posted image . As can be seen the red line in the left image has been grossly deformed in the right image. The blue part in the right image doesn't even appear in the left image. The green in both images are not the same at all. All this distortion was probably caused by the spherical deformation tool in SPM. I have to assume the original (non deformed image) was fine as a 3D image. Attached is an image of one I warped with SPM and you can see how SPM distorted the arm in the upper right. |
Mar 7th |
 |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Another good pop-up image. It would really look great printed as a very large picture and setting on the floor with the Ruhmi looking up begging for a scratch behind the ear. |
Mar 6th |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
WOW! What a massive oak tree. Great 3D image (a little small though). I wonder what it looked like to Robin Hood. Was the tree his base of just that part of Sherwood Forest? |
Mar 6th |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Interesting image, but only the center has good 3D - the worm in the middle of the flower. When a square image is processed through spherical deformation in SPM it looks good in the middle but the images on the outside of the sphere at the 45 deg. angles are quite compressed and hard to look at. I try to put a black frame around the square image about 1/10 the size of the image and then when SPM spherically distorts it, the exaggerated corners are not so compressed. |
Mar 6th |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
You did a good job with the highlights. Other wise, it tells a great story. Too bad I can't see the image the lady is looking at. |
Mar 6th |
| 68 |
Mar 22 |
Comment |
Such a lot of flowers in the pink frosting. And who doesn't love chocolate chips? This would have made a great phantogram if it were taken at a 45 deg. angle. It pops out of the screen just fine. |
Mar 6th |
6 comments - 3 replies for Group 68
|
6 comments - 3 replies Total
|