|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Reply |
I tried to bring out some detail in those men, but when I lightened up that part of the image, I could see the outline of the men, but there was no detail in them. I did move all of their bodies the same in depth, but as they are the same shade as the floor, that doesn't show. I suppose I could have made their lower parts a tad lighter, but I didn't think of that then. |
Aug 21st |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Reply |
I have the latest version of Photoshop. I looked at the 3D functions and they don't work on my computer. It says that I need to set up some function for my video card and I don't know now what to do. When I first got this version of Photoshop, I thought that the 3D functions are more oriented to 3D printing. Photoshop will load an .MPO file as anaglyph. I have tried to learn how to set up Photoshop to show an .MPO file as side-by-side but have had no luck. Photoshop will save a side-by-side image as an .MPO file and SPM will show it as 3D. Photoshop will also load and save a .JPS 3D file, but I don't use that format any more. If any one else has more info or is using Photoshop's 3D functions for stereoscopic 3D, let talk more. |
Aug 21st |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Reply |
I thought about removing the blue "SCI" and the "LIVE" at the top, but I felt that was part of the "TV" image. I also thought, after removing those parts, of making a joking comment that I had snuck aboard the ship and took the 3D image with my W3 - but my sense of humor is not that good. I had a lot of trouble getting the astronaut to look good in 3D, but he still looks a bit of overdone in depth. I finally said "enough fun with SPM" and sent the image in. |
Aug 14th |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
It's fun using SPM and depth map to convert an old 2D image to 3D. You did a good job. I used to have a '30 A Ford that looked just like that. First, I was wondering what that black line is that seems to be attached to the porch but goes off the screen to the right? I seem to have problems seeing (in 3D) the places on the wheels where the hubcaps would go. They seem odd and not round in 3D. Also, in 2D, the white patches in the ground on the left seem to be just places where there are no plants, but in 3D they look like weeds up in the air. All the ground seems to be up and down more than I would expect. One thing I found real fast using SPMs depth map is that I need to make my image 4 times as high in pixel size to get good -fine detail- results. It seems that SPM can only move any point in the image by one whole pixel and sometimes that represents too much depth change. It makes some parts of the image have too much depth and other parts to look like a series of cardboard cut outs. |
Aug 14th |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Great image! Makes me wonder how rich one would have to be now days to pay someone to decorate the upper corner of your room with so much fine detail that you might look at not that often. Great image with good depth and focus. |
Aug 14th |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Great image of flowers. Like others said white flowers are hard to get lots of surface detail. The only thing that bothers me is the white peddle in the lower center, way behind the other peddles, that in one eye it's a lot brighter that in the other eye. That eye rivalry causes me to look there too much. One might try to equalize that brightness in Photoshop or make both parts darker or something. |
Aug 14th |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Great image of the beach. I might have cropped/cloned out the 1/2 lady on the left and the guy on the left in the ocean. The rocks are at the window and look fine to me. You must have had a real fast shutter speed because I can see the white towel the man is putting over his chair as the wind blew on it - all in focus - and the front of the umbrella seems to be bent in from wind as well. Something one couldn't see if not for 3D. I looked at your image with 3D glasses and could zoom in on those things. |
Aug 14th |
| 68 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Interesting view of Yellowstone lake. I've been there a few times and I don't remember this exact view. I wish I had attended that conference. Well done though. |
Aug 14th |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 68
|
5 comments - 3 replies Total
|
