|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Reply |
I guess Mohanan hasn't updated your correct image yet as the one I see -Monday morning- is the same image. |
Oct 14th |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
I found the color enhanced image I did. It looks not so rainy with a bit more color. |
Oct 13th |
 |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
I can't say much about this other than I like it, it shows great depth and invites me to want to walk right up those stairs. |
Oct 13th |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
An intriguing image of today's Bird of Paradise along side of yesterday's Bird of Paradise - the beautiful VS the withered. When I look at it directly from the screen, the flower appears rather out of the window with a slight window violation, but when I look at with SPM and my stereo glasses the colorful flower is WAY in front of the window and hard to see. The pipe in the ground is at the window. It would look much better if the flower was at, or just a little in front of, the window. You can fix that in SPM with the "Easy Adjustment..." function. |
Oct 13th |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Pretty good job in putting the 3 images together in 3D with photoshop, but my first impression was there is a bit of perceived size issues here. As I recall in the movie, relative to a car, R2D2 only about 1/2 that tall. And the car as it appears on your driveway is more than 1/2 the width of the driveway which would make it seem to be over 12' wide. Natural looking shadows are hard to do in 3D with photoshop. One can see the shadow on the left side of the house, but there are no shadows of the car or R2D2. It looks like you did add a shadow all around the R2D2 that is in your hand. |
Oct 13th |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Nice 3D image! In my opinion the heads are not in the focus of the image and I wouldn't have even noticed them if you hadn't mentioned them. I would have removed them. The hall and windows give a good perspective of the size of the balls. |
Oct 13th |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Looks like fun traveling and taking images of foreign places. It must have been a real overcast day or the image was a bit over exposed. I can't see much of the buildings roofs next to the sky or the detail of the distant street. I tried to enhance the color and contrast some, but it still looked like a "Rainy street in Amsterdam". |
Oct 13th |
| 68 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Interesting inclusion of both the model and photographer. Did you set the f and time manually or did you let the W3 do it for you? Did you go in the model shoot when there were a lot of others photographers in there waiting in line? Well done. |
Oct 13th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 68
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|