|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
I thought I'd see what it looked like concave, but it doesn't work very well. Everyone knows that mountains (they still look like mountains) are in the far background. I only made the background the same color and swapped the left and right globes. I think the original looks better. |
Oct 20th |
 |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
looks much better. |
Oct 20th |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Reply |
Yes, I know about that sync system. The 2 cameras I had were Sony film cameras and it was way before the data maker came out. A short antidote: this kid was really interested in me taking his picture so he did a lot of aggressive/dangerous things. He went over one jump too fast and came crashing down to the ground with the bike on top of himself. I missed the shot and asked him to do it again when I was ready. Obviously hurting from the crash, he retorted "NO WAY!" and stopped showing off so much. The missed shot is always the one we talk about. |
Oct 20th |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Hey! this is something else. It has a lot of depth and interesting shapes. If someone was to ask what it was, it would be hard to tell. Visually, it has little to relate to the original image, but that's just fine. The satellite looks rather cool floating way out in front of the image. Any reason why the background on the right is darker than that of the left? If it were a "New Planet" I would expect it would be convex, not concave. |
Oct 13th |
| 68 |
Oct 17 |
Comment |
Interesting well done image with one exception. The string that holds the cube in front is behind the cube that is way back. As you did this in PS, I'm sure you can fix the string to be in front of the back cube. The clouds are well placed as well. Sometimes when adding clouds they are placed way to far back. I like it! |
Oct 13th |
3 comments - 2 replies for Group 68
|
3 comments - 2 replies Total
|