|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 68 |
Feb 17 |
Comment |
I can't say much more that I like it. You did a great job. The many color pads on the surface, the buds popping up, the pretty fish in the water and the moss on the bottom of the water all come through grate in the 3D effect. |
Feb 22nd |
| 68 |
Feb 17 |
Comment |
My first impression was WOW a 2D to 3D conversion and not that bad either. I saw the flower coming out of the screen. I had to copy the image and look at it in SPM with my 3D monitor and noticed that the flower is still rather flat (each petal could have a different shape and depth). How did you cut the flower out of its image. The ragged edges mite suggest this was the first time you cut out a layer. Did you use PS? Also a minor point, the stem of the flower on the left image is in front of the border flowers and on the right image it is behind the border. The clouds look fine in the background. |
Feb 22nd |
| 68 |
Feb 17 |
Comment |
My first impression was why are the white flashes in the middle there? Was the airplane flashing a white light or something, then I read all of your notes and sure enough it was a freeway up side down. Interesting image and invites one to look and look again and again! |
Feb 22nd |
| 68 |
Feb 17 |
Comment |
Nice image. I agree with the window and the rock. The bird looks well in it's environment. |
Feb 22nd |
| 68 |
Feb 17 |
Reply |
I got lots of clouds in my stock of 3D images. I just might try some of them on the right. You can do a lot of things with other images to "fix up" one image that needs a little help. |
Feb 22nd |
| 68 |
Feb 17 |
Reply |
As the reflection of Mt Rainer in the fake water is all generated in PS, I could have made it any height I wanted. I thought about how much lake there should be, but this was my guess. If the lake was as big as the grass in the original image, I thought the reflection (as to where I stood) would still be small and be about like I made it. Do you think, standing on the road, the reflection would be larger? Thanks for your comment. |
Feb 22nd |
4 comments - 2 replies for Group 68
|
4 comments - 2 replies Total
|