|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 21 |
Aug 17 |
Reply |
Brian, Thank you for taking the time to offer such complete feedback. I agree with your assessment of the need for shadows. That's an easy fix. The reason the egret's right wingtip disappears behind the frame is that I wanted him/her to appear to be flying out of the frame. I appreciate your valuable feedback and the time you put into it adds to the value. |
Aug 30th |
| 21 |
Aug 17 |
Comment |
Thank you for describing your technique so clearly. I'm always interested in learning the hundreds of secrets imbedded in Photoshop. I'm going to have to try the peeling page technique. It works wonders here. |
Aug 26th |
| 21 |
Aug 17 |
Comment |
This is a wonderful example of "the whole is greater than a sum of its parts." Combining the photos gives a stronger, more engaging photo than either one does by itself. The important tool here was your eye in seeing the value of a composite. |
Aug 15th |
2 comments - 1 reply for Group 21
|
| 34 |
Aug 17 |
Comment |
Phil, I'm a member of Group 21, and I always browse other groups. I like the style of "Afternoon in the Park," and I appreciate your revealing the "secret sauce." I do have a couple of questions. Does "shadows and exposure up" mean to move the slider into the plus side? In the same vein, does move "highlights down" mean to move the slider to the minus side? Lastly, how do you handle saturation in the 2 Nik apps? Do you use it in both or just 1? Please answer the questions in my space in Group 21 or on my gmail account at junquemail5@gmail.com. Thank you for sharing the "sauce." The soft detail works very well.
Alan |
Aug 23rd |
1 comment - 0 replies for Group 34
|
3 comments - 1 reply Total
|