|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Reply |
Oh my! |
Jan 27th |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Reply |
Will do. I didn't notice it before and now that's all I see! Thanks.
|
Jan 12th |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
I see what you mean. Thanks! Is this better? |
Jan 9th |
 |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
You brought out such nice details in your post processing. I like the blue and gold colors very much. Very nice image and well handled. My only suggestion is to straighten it out some. I feel like it is leaning slightly to the left. You have enough room in your original shot to do so without cutting out any of the building. |
Jan 7th |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
What a wonderful and unusual subject you found. Your focus is good. For my taste, it is a little bright and cropped in too tightly. I would have liked to have seen more of the house. |
Jan 7th |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
Your shutter speed was just right to stop the action in this shot. It is such a nice nature photo and you handled the whites very well. I agree with David's crop. With the two pelicans cut in half on the right eliminated, I think it is a much stronger image. |
Jan 7th |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
Interesting lines. Almost an architectural abstract. I agree with David to increase the contrast for a little more impact. I might also suggest cropping in a little on the left to eliminate the lighter patch in the upper left corner and to also crop out some of the soft focused railings on the left. |
Jan 7th |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
Such a sweet picture! You caught his wonder in that expression. I like your crop, focusing in on the boy. The lights in the background add so much to the overall feel of the season. A great human interest photo for the holidays. I wouldn't change a thing. Nicely done!
|
Jan 7th |
| 45 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
You have nice focus and clarity in the buildings and although bland, the sky color is such a nice shade of blue. I like that you can see a trace of the mountains on the horizon. I also like the star bursts of the lights. For my taste, there is too much blank sky to the left. I think cropping in from the left would eliminate some of the area (sky and ground) that has little interest or detail. |
Jan 7th |
 |
7 comments - 2 replies for Group 45
|
| 50 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
A technically well done image. I like James' crop. Cropping in so much on the lamp makes it look intentional, whereas the original shows too much of the lamp which really didn't add anything to the photo |
Jan 9th |
| 50 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
You are so good at panning. The car is tack sharp and the background shows movement. Excellent job! |
Jan 9th |
| 50 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
Nicely handled focus and a simple composition that is very appealing. You did a nice job of converting it to monochrome. The monochrome is very nice, however, I like the color a little more. The yellow, blue and touch of green colors are so nice together. |
Jan 9th |
| 50 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
I do think this could be considered a "street shot", and what an interesting "street"! I like your crop very much. I would suggest adding just a little more contrast and maybe a slight vignette. |
Jan 9th |
 |
| 50 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
I like this image and your crop very much. I would, however, like to see something through the doorway - perhaps a composite where you can put something there. |
Jan 9th |
| 50 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
I like what James did. In your version, Tte photo looks like it is tiltled to the left. |
Jan 9th |
| 50 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
I agree about the contrast. How's this? |
Jan 9th |
 |
7 comments - 0 replies for Group 50
|
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Reply |
I rotated the flower and bud and lightened the edges. Better? |
Jan 26th |
 |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Reply |
I like this version vry much. |
Jan 22nd |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
An interesting study of lines and the circular bucket adds contrast and interest. For me, the image is too bright and I find the red gets in the way of the study of lines and shadows. I turned it into monochrome, straightened the skew, increased the contdrast of the shadows and aded a vignette. I find this interesting although not a close-up type photo. |
Jan 12th |
 |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
Wonderful focus, details and exposure. The background really works. You have done a nice job showing off the clockworks and the reflection grounds it. Although nice the way it is, I, too, would like to see more of the reflection if you have it - maybe with a vertical crop. But, if not, very nice the way it is! |
Jan 12th |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
A ball of fur! You captured a fun moment. You have nice details and texture in their fur. For my taste, the background is too bright. I blurred and darkened it. I only wish that I could see an eye or two. |
Jan 12th |
 |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
The leaf and first 3 fruits are very sharp an show great textures, however, the top right one is out of focus and my eye seems to go there and to the bright background. I like the colors and cropping (except for the tip of a leaf on the lower left which can be easiy cloned out). |
Jan 12th |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Reply |
I was concerned about the "floating", so I really appreciate your comment. |
Jan 12th |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
I love old rusty things. You found a gem here - the textures and colors are outstanding, as is your focus. The nicely blurred background really sets the subject up. I wouldn't change a thing. |
Jan 7th |
| 57 |
Jan 23 |
Comment |
What an awesome succulent to photograph. The color are lovely - like an opal gem. You have nice details, textures and shapes. I find the background distracting and would suggest that you crop in to leave the background out. |
Jan 7th |
6 comments - 3 replies for Group 57
|
20 comments - 5 replies Total
|