|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 47 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
It certainly is an interesting Tree, Jen, especially given the context here of he cemetery. I'm a little unsure about the sky - the clouds do have some nice texture, but you could actually crop down into the tree, and the viewer would still get the sheltering connotation of the tree, and it might focus the scene a little better. |
Nov 11th |
| 47 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
I think it's a beautiful landscape Albert, and I especially like how the sky renders. My take is that the image loses its way in the foreground, so to speak, with the river split as it is, there's no path for the eye into the scene. There are crop possibilities, my preference would be to render this as more of a pano, cropped just below the line of conifers, with their rich blacks, and the natural line they form to frame the scene. |
Nov 11th |
| 47 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
I second Don's comments, though I think maybe just more DOF was called for. This has interesting texture and graphic qualities, and is otherwise very well done. |
Nov 11th |
| 47 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
A classic composition with these leading lines, perfectly composed to avoid anything else, and just love the shadows. Great detail, great sense of place. |
Nov 11th |
| 47 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
Great reflection, Ed, and I agree the piling leads the eye to the cutters. Overall however it does feel to me as if there is too much going on, and that I might have tried to focus in more on one part of the scene. That's hard to do, of course, if you keep the piling. I also find the frame distracting, especially down near the bottom of the scene. Lots to enjoy and yet it doesn't quite come together for me. |
Nov 10th |
| 47 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
Once again you've captured a moment, John, though I do wish the head wasn't there in the bottom left corner. I think the two people being there together help tell the story, though sometimes I wish there were just one, as I'm not sure which one to look at and I keep going back and forth. It's an interesting slice of life, and the nice contrast in the stones is a bonus. |
Nov 10th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 47
|
| 66 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
I think Gary's version is great and a good reminder that IR images are often in need of quite a bit of added contrast. In this case it brings out that texture in the sand in the foreground, which adds a lot to this image. I agree with Craig's idea about getting down low, can add a bit of originality to the perspective and the result. Nice image, Palli. |
Nov 12th |
| 66 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
Well, you've certainly accomplished creating an old photo feel out of this, Gary. I was starting to think it must have been some kind of re-enactment, etc. I'm a little uncomfortable with the centered-ness of the composition, and wonder what others think about that. And while I'm not a fan of noise and grain used stylistically, or digital frames, I think you did a very good job achieving what you were after. |
Nov 12th |
| 66 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
I am also enjoying this scene and the others' renditions Melanie. For me, the lichen on the rocks in the foreground is the main interest in this image; so much so, that it almost feels like it wants to be a vertical. The trees on the other side of the lake are a little "hot" for me. |
Nov 12th |
| 66 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
Beautiful scene Craig, and I like that the issue of infrared is forgotten, as it were. To me the lower left and upper right trees play off each other, making the image for me. I love the mood and sense of place conveyed. |
Nov 11th |
| 66 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
Thanks, Gary, much better!
I think sometimes when we've brought an image a long way already, we don't know it can go even further, takes a set of fresh eyes. |
Nov 11th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 66
|
11 comments - 0 replies Total
|