|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Thanks Morrie. One of those when you enjoy the end result even if not when actually taking the photo. |
Jan 26th |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Thanks Cindy. It was rather breezy, but not all that cold. |
Jan 26th |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Thanks Craig! |
Jan 24th |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Well done! I like the balanced composition. The sky has great contrasting clouds. I wonder if a polarizer could have reduced the hot spots in the highway? |
Jan 16th |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Quite an interesting abstract! I had no idea what we were looking at until I read your description. Thanks for sharing. |
Jan 16th |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
This is an interesting photo, one that I truly would love, but I am afraid that the halos that we see in the top and bottom of the photo detract from the photo. Whenever we shoot into the sun, we have to be aware of the lens flare that will likely be introduced. Can you return to this location and shoot again with the sun not in the frame. And if there would be a bit of fog, that would be a plus. |
Jan 16th |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
As David said, a bit more DOF would be nice. Toward the upper right corner is a very blurry object that I cannot discern what it is. I would remove this along with the two fish in the very corner. Also consider removing the bottome three fish.
Thanks for sharing. Although a rather busy photo, I like how the viewer gets lost among all the fish. |
Jan 16th |
 |
| 49 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Although I prefer a bit more DOF, I do like this photo. The colored tips of the flower are sharp and your eye is attracted to this. |
Jan 16th |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 49
|
5 comments - 3 replies Total
|