|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Reply |
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the reply. I mainly work in Photoshop and Camera Raw, rarely Lightroom, but I should learn Lightroom.
I opened a noisy image in PS Camera Raw, went to the Detail module, Noise Reduction and moved the Luminance slider to the right. It works!
By the way as I am sure you know, Camera Raw is nondestructive also. You may have noticed that the files I submit have a suffix of p-1,2, etc. Whenever I am not in Camera Raw and work on a file, I save it as p something so that my original file is never changed. There is probably a better way to do this but for now this is my convention.
Thanks,
Henry |
Jun 18th |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
Ah, Karen, a wonderful portrait of a wide eyed frog resting up before the big jump. I like the framing - it looks as though big frog is ready to jump out onto my desk!
I don't know how you achieved the grainy appearance - however you did it, the enhancement is far better than a straight photograph.
I would disagree with Andrew as I think you need the catch lights in the eye to contrast with the black. |
Jun 18th |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
Curtis, welcome to the group!
Curtis, I like the rose blossoms, I like the weathered wood, I like the sharpness of the weathered wood and flower, I like the blurred background. But for me, the composition does not work. As I have a preference for verticals, if I had been taking this image I would have tried for a vertical format.
I look forward to more of your exciting work.
|
Jun 18th |
 |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
Jamie, your black and white rendition really works for this image. Yes, a sharper image would be better but this works.
If you had left this as a colored image, I would want the indistinct grass blades included but in black and white I don't think they would work.
The comments of the others all have merit. |
Jun 18th |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
Bai, you are a master at night time images! You are really creative they way you combined several images for the final result. I like the motion of the road curving through the image and the interest of the building on the right.
I wondered about doing some cropping. I tried cropping out the building on the right but it is an essential part of the composition. I tried cropping out some of the bottom but that would leave the grass stems sticking up without support. So your cropping is fine. |
Jun 18th |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
Susan, your combining two differently exposed images really works. And your vertical cropping really works. I like the depth of the image implied by the sharpness of the orchid and artwork in the foreground and foliage in the background. There is a lot to enjoy and contemplate in this image. You really had good artistic judgement in placing the orchid and art work. I find a slight distraction that window lines are not vertical but maybe they don't need to be because this is an artistic creation of yours. |
Jun 18th |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
Andrew, you did a beautiful job of centering on this church art work. Now for some of my own personal preferences which don't necessarily match that of others. I like the rich color balance of the original. I also would like the inclusion of the windows on the left and the figures on the right because they add to the story that this is in a cathedral. Of course one would have to dodge and burn these areas to make them fit in. Well, each of us to our own tastes.
You did a beautiful job of de-noising. How did you do this? In photoshop or in a plug in?
Now, after reading the comments of the others, I would agree with them and think your response image is much better. But I would still like inclusion of the left and right sides that have been cropped out to tell a fuller story. |
Jun 18th |
| 40 |
Jun 17 |
Comment |
Hi Susan,
You have a good idea to imply more trees to the right.
Henry |
Jun 9th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 40
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|