|
Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
18 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Nice creative shot - I like it but I think your second version is better positioning. |
Oct 20th |
18 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Very creative effect - good job. I think the green foliage really helps make this image. I tend to agree the tractor is a little low in the frame. |
Oct 20th |
18 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Great effect. I agree about cloning out some sheep. Nothing else I can say. |
Oct 20th |
18 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I like this - how did you do it? |
Oct 20th |
18 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Neat idea which is unusual. I agree that the black background improves it. |
Oct 20th |
18 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
No, it's a small pottery figure |
Oct 5th |
 |
4 comments - 2 replies for Group 18
|
40 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
Not at this time. |
Oct 26th |
 |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Reply |
? |
Oct 26th |
 |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
It might have been, unfortunately visit time constraints made that difficult. I am sure we will be going back for another viewing, in which case I will make sure I get it right. |
Oct 22nd |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Good treatment, I would never have thought of this rotation but it works well. The mono transform is also most effective. My only suggestion - there is a slight light sliver on the left hand side and at the top and I would be tempted to clone it in dark or crop to lose it. Then I think you have a winner! |
Oct 12th |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Good capture and effective treatment in post. Nothing really to suggest for improvement. Perhaps would be even better if Cooper was looking at the camera. What do you think? |
Oct 12th |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
My feeling is that the image is maybe 3/4 stop underexposed which is why the harbour mouth appears to have a "bar" across it. It's up to you of course but I would be tempted to lose quite a bit of the water at the bottom so the skyline isn't in the middle of the image and maybe some of the left so the harbour isn't central. But it's your picture. |
Oct 12th |
 |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
You have a good shot here of an interesting subject. Minor comments: there is a bit of keystoning so the verticals would benefit from straightening - this is hard in post because you can straighten one side (here the right is OK) but end up with a tilt on the other (left) side which is wonky. Perhaps best to correct straighten up before taking the image. I also think beneficial to include some detail in the area outside the windows which you have lost in the final version. HDR might help here. But the image is of historic interest and a project well worth pursuing. |
Oct 12th |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I agree with Don that opening the mouth a bit more, perhaps him holding the head down a touch would work better. But a nice capture and good treatment. |
Oct 12th |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
Nice capture. My feeling is this a picture in two parts with the couple on the left separate to the 4 figures on the right. So maybe improved by cropping the left 2 out and also losing the notice right at the top which tends to catch the eye too much. |
Oct 12th |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I am commenting. IMHO the sculpture is "master of the universe" and a 2D photograph of the figure in a pastoral environment isn't and is fair game to be called something else. I was entering it in an exhibition with a "geometry" subsection so it seemed reasonable to chance my luck with the new title. However, I could well end up with nul points as often happens. |
Oct 12th |
40 |
Oct 21 |
Comment |
I DO tend to crop too tight. I took several versions but preferred the sideways view. |
Oct 1st |
 |
9 comments - 2 replies for Group 40
|
13 comments - 4 replies Total
|