|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 18 |
Apr 21 |
Reply |
Yes thanks, I have only just discovered this in PS. |
Apr 18th |
| 18 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
Welcome to the group, David.
I think this is most effective - good job. I think I like Jim's version better though.
I think it might better with a title like "blue zebra stripes" as a viewer might otherwise get confused by the eye. |
Apr 18th |
| 18 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
Great, I have nothing to add. |
Apr 18th |
| 18 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
I like the effect, perhaps not so fond of the moon. This seems to have a slight tilt to it (or is that my imagination?). |
Apr 18th |
| 18 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
I think this is very effective; for me the blue colour works very well, it certainly grabs the attention. I find the grey "shadow" around the plant stem off-putting though. |
Apr 18th |
| 18 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
I thought that too, thanks. |
Apr 5th |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 18
|
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Reply |
Thanks, I didn't think about a head shot. |
Apr 28th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
These suggestions are a definite improvement - thanks |
Apr 27th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
It might work to tilt the camera down to catch more of the beams of the wharf. One isn't "supposed" to do this but sometimes it is better. |
Apr 20th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
I think it works well with the boy even cut off at the knees, the key points are the faces. |
Apr 20th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Reply |
Good picture in the PSA Showcase - very atmospheric. I like it a lot. |
Apr 20th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
I like the image a lot. My only comments are that the centre of the flower is a little soft (not much one can do about that now, of course). I think the image might benefit from slightly increasing the contrast and vibrance. |
Apr 18th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
To work a picture has to tell some kind of a "story" for example the derelict ferry wharf contrasting the new building on the other side of the strait. The wooden piling/wharf in the foreground is obviously the prominent feature of the picture but I don't know what it is or what it was like before being demolished. The beam right at the bottom of the picture catches the eye and might be better darkened or even cropped off. The plant is missing its base and is just confusing. There is a lot going on the other side of the strait but it is too far away to see what is happening. I don't know whether you could take a shot a few yards to the right so the old wharf is pictured more sideways on. This doesn't work for me - sorry. |
Apr 18th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
I think this is great picture, the alien looking at him when he was unaware of it is most spooky and effective. My only criticism is I think there a slight blue cast most evident on the boards of the house which otherwise detracts but should be easily corrected. Maybe a different title like "behind you" might also be better but that's up to you. |
Apr 18th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
Nice shot taken under difficult circumstances. I think you have done well to minimise the messy background. The tail is a bit soft and it might have been better if it was slightly more sideways on (but I appreciate that is not always possible). |
Apr 18th |
| 40 |
Apr 21 |
Comment |
Well spotted. I think you have done a good crop which suits the subject. As Stephen has said the shadows make the image more interesting. It works better in B&W. My only criticism is that perhaps it is a little "busy" |
Apr 18th |
8 comments - 2 replies for Group 40
|
13 comments - 3 replies Total
|