|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 34 |
Oct 23 |
Comment |
As everyone has said, this is a fun, comical image. The critters add a lot of joy. I agree that James' opacity should be increased. Maybe if you moved him a little closer to the waterfall and let some of the water flow over him, there would be better cohesion of the image. |
Oct 28th |
| 34 |
Oct 23 |
Comment |
Jan,, you do have such a creative imagination. I struggle every month for a new idea. The wall with the arches coming out and the road (portal) for the birds is ingenious. I think you have the perspective right for the architecture. I agree with Mike that the two birds should be removed. They don't really add anything to the story. Good job. |
Oct 12th |
| 34 |
Oct 23 |
Comment |
the use of the edge detection feature works well here to isolate the left hand flower and bee. the rest remains as the background and is not distracting. |
Oct 11th |
| 34 |
Oct 23 |
Comment |
Gunter, your abstract B&W image derived from your "original" is a good starting place. The addition of the floral, original 2 brings color and life to the image. I agree that the darker parts ended up too dark and need some brightening. |
Oct 11th |
| 34 |
Oct 23 |
Comment |
Steve, you have ended up with an excellent image. The color palette is lovely. The new sky works well and the sun beams finish the sky off perfectly. The stones look as if they have always been there. The musicians appear to be playing to the stone's as the audience. The use of plugins and software work well to finish off the image. |
Oct 11th |
| 34 |
Oct 23 |
Comment |
Frans, you have done a terrific job, overall with this image. The tiger is nicely framed with the leaves that surround him. I feel that the black spot on the tiger's nose should be removed. Also, in my opinion, the tiger's eyes are too bright. If you darkened them a bit, the lighting on his eyes would be closer to that of the rest of the animals. In your original the hummingbird is on a background that has nothing behind him which is how a hummingbird usually appears. The leaves behind the bird make the bird appear to be slightly perched which is not how they feed. Removing the ferns to give an empty, dark background would appear more natural. Also, the bird seems to be a bit to big in relationship to the other animals. Hummingbirds are usually tiny. I believe reducing its size would be an improvement. I agree with Steve about the tiger's whiskers in front of the monkey's head. In my opinion it would be better to remove them or reduce their opacity. The frog seems lost on the monkey's nose. Moving it to the upper right hand corner on one of the big leaves should give it more prominence. Increasing the frog's size a bit would make it more visible. This is just a picky point, but the edge on the baby monkey's head on the left top seems too sharp. Softening that just a bit should improve the blend. The white pelican and fish round out the image beautifully. You have presented beautiful work as always. Good Luck. |
Oct 2nd |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 34
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|