|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 23 |
Feb 21 |
Reply |
Yes |
Feb 23rd |
| 23 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
I suspect it would be difficult and painstaking to remove the foliage from the bird's head, and it would not be allowed in Nature images. You just have to keep going back! Nice image. |
Feb 23rd |
| 23 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
What can one say? Yet another great shoe image. I'm just so glad that this fashion has never hit men's fashion - I'm wobbly on my pins now and then - these would be terrifying. |
Feb 23rd |
| 23 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Good scene - works well. You have a good sky that is picked out in the water. The sky in Stuart's version is dramatic, but should it not be reflected in the water?
Hope you are enjoying the group. |
Feb 23rd |
| 23 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Don't we all like taking pictures of rusty items - the sort we would throw out if they were in our home?
I have great difficulty taking images with the phone - when the sun's out I can't see what I have got in the frame!
Effective image - well caught - the middle vehicle looks the most interesting! |
Feb 23rd |
| 23 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Some interesting features, but is difficult to focus on any one part of the image - so much to look at. Would a crop which focusses on the branch be effective? |
Feb 23rd |
| 23 |
Feb 21 |
Comment |
Good action shot - well caught. If you removed the "added" fire, it would work as a PJ image. |
Feb 23rd |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 23
|
6 comments - 1 reply Total
|