|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 19 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
The woman's clothes, tower and arches make this a good travel image, but out of three judges perhaps one would object to the light streaks. Look at the PTD definition and it is a bit unclear how much light swtreak is acceptable. I would go PTD with one without the light streaks, and put this in color open. It is a very good image either way. I just tried it out on my wife Shirley, PTD secretary, and she had trouble with it. It was not clear how she would go on it. Like I said in PTD I would expect one judge to give it a low score. I is color open and of course this is not a PTD study group. |
Jan 26th |
| 19 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I agee with cropping a little of the sand. The color of the sky and smooth water is great. The pontoon boat makes a great and appropriatee foreground object that a good sunset rreally need. |
Jan 26th |
| 19 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
If I saw an image with the feet, I might like it better, but I am not sure, they might just be a distraction. Cropping off body parts seem to become an issue if it looks like a mistake. You crop more off and it doesn't. I don't think I want to see more of the street, I don't think most people would even notice that her feet are cut off. Hopefully they concentrate on the door and her upper body. |
Jan 26th |
| 19 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
This guy is great for street photogaphy. Lots of personality. The smoking, T-shirt, bald head, trash behind him, fish on the right and scale all tell the story of this person. The only way it might be better is to get him with a tatoo or something. You did very well. I also have mixed emotopms about the guy behind. Does he add to the story or become a distraction. I suspect you have to take this like right now or the posture, cigar, or whatever wuld lose their importancee in the image. Well done. |
Jan 26th |
| 19 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I fankly would prefer to see the pussy willow and vase sharp. the backgound soft is great. I like soft light to soften shadows, but I personally prefer the subject to be crisp. |
Jan 26th |
| 19 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
Beautiful! Frame it and hang it. I like that you have the shrub on the left to give it a foreground object. I feel that another good shot of it might be from the right a bit to get the shrub in fromt of the door off to the left, but you need to keep that shrub on the left in the frame. When you have an image this good you probably take a number of shots. You might have another one that is good. |
Jan 26th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 19
|
| 64 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
With today's software you can probably make tha sky any tone you want and I think the no detail sky is fine with many of the images. My main concern is to adjust it so there is contrast with everything that touches the sky, so I thihk this sky is fine. It seems to have a bit of perspective distortion and with a relatively low building I would corrct pefrspective. I think this is a great building with a lot of impact. |
Jan 26th |
| 64 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I normally would not use the tone and Tri-X, but it is very appropriate for where he is and how he is dressed. Good choice. The catch light is a significant improvement. |
Jan 26th |
| 64 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
This is a great storm, but normally we want a foreground in the image. There is the island, but I don't know that it is enough. I personally think I like it better cropped to make the island more prominent in the image. |
Jan 26th |
| 64 |
Jan 25 |
Comment |
I agree, there are unique things about this compoistion of a common subject. I like that there are not a lot of leaves but there are some. The branches make a pattern of a lot of lines. I like the way you positioned it so the primary lines point to a place 1/3 in from the left and 1/3 down from the top. Often these images end up cenered left to right. This is better. |
Jan 16th |
4 comments - 0 replies for Group 64
|
10 comments - 0 replies Total
|