|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 31 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
These ducks look amazing in colour, when well photographed.
I have never considered converting such an image to monochrome but I may well look that way at some of my images!
The water is excellent and adds much to the image.
I particularly like the angle of the bird in the frame.
|
Feb 19th |
| 31 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
I myself have tried to create such images but my efforts pale into insignificance compared to this one!
That highlight which Peter has mentioned could be toned down as it is a minor distraction.
Great stuff! |
Feb 19th |
| 31 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
An interesting idea which can be pursued.
That the tomato is a tomato does not really matter; the fact that it differs from the eggs is the point.
It may be worth scanning the negative again with different settings. |
Feb 19th |
| 31 |
Feb 18 |
Reply |
I agree that toning those areas down would improve the image.
I am not so sure about the cloning suggestion. |
Feb 19th |
| 31 |
Feb 18 |
Reply |
Yes, those areas are a bit too bright. |
Feb 19th |
| 31 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
A superb image.
The snow is well shown.
I like the foreground details.
A small distraction is the sign on the left. A small distarction as I dd not notice it until the third time I looked at the image.
Great stuff! |
Feb 19th |
| 31 |
Feb 18 |
Comment |
Converging verticals! Well used indeed.
Your image really captures the structure of the building.
As Peter says the tones in this image are truly excellent.
Vert well done. |
Feb 19th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 31
|
5 comments - 2 replies Total
|