|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
To answer about the twig that others have commented on, this was somebody's back yard and I would feel reluctant to move anything on another's property. |
Jan 12th |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Reply |
Tanks, Joe. I think it tends to bring the focus back into the main image. Besides, it would be tedious to remove. |
Jan 6th |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Very impactful image with great sense of drama and movement. Nice use of monochrome. Slight sharpness irregularity is not an important criticism, in that the composition and exposure and sense of excitement is all there. |
Jan 4th |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Pleased that I had guessed the subject before identified. Very nice feel of motion and drama. Shame to consume it after using it in such engaging work. |
Jan 4th |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Interesting subject well captured. I much better physical shape than expected in this building now so long abandoned. Would not beg for identification if unknown. Can't quite put this room in context for Alcatraz. |
Jan 4th |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Interesting tryptic well composed and exposed. The making of a three is very effective. Has a kind of canvas feel. |
Jan 4th |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
This is a staggeringly gorgeous image and subject. Could not be better (unless perhaps the left sleeve), and the smile is a veritable Mona Lisa emulation. What a fantastic lady so well caught. |
Jan 4th |
| 17 |
Jan 20 |
Comment |
Love the apparent interaction between the two. Owls are so often imaged alone. Gives new feeling to the "Who?". Technically very god as well. |
Jan 4th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 17
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|
