|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 4 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I think that it's a fascinating image, and tells me a lot about the clock, whatever is being done to it. I prefer the original, because it tells me more about the building. |
Dec 14th |
| 4 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I think that it is spectacular! I can't interpret the facial expression of an egret, but it certainly is delightful. Well composed and exposed. I really think that I should go there some time. |
Dec 14th |
| 4 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I find it a pleasant, calm scene, but I think it might be a bit dull. I'm reminded of some TV ads for a medication that I won't mention, and might suggest that you Photoshop a couple of people in bathtubs instead of the canopies. |
Dec 14th |
| 4 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I too found the image too bright, and I think that Isaac's change works well. I've seen a number of successful light painting shots, but no one has ever told me how you decide on the exposure if the light beam is being moved. I think I'd prefer it with the tower to the left cropped out. |
Dec 14th |
| 4 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I think that it's a great composition, and I particularly like the bridge off to the side. I have no problem with the blue of the shadows. However, I think that the bright part of the image of the hills is kind of flat (pun intended.) That may be an artifact of HDR. For me, Isaac's rendering is more effective. |
Dec 14th |
| 4 |
Dec 17 |
Comment |
I've never seen an image of this site before, so it is certainly informative. I agree that Guy's adjustments make the image pop better. |
Dec 14th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 4
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|