|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 52 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Well done. There is a wonderful story here beside your getting the color, clarity, focus and detail so nicely done. Great job! |
Apr 19th |
| 52 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Well done. I like the background to help present and give this subject pop. The color is wonderful. I only suggest sharpen some the top yellow area. Very nice image. |
Apr 19th |
| 52 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Excellent. I have no suggestions. You nailed this one. |
Apr 19th |
| 52 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Excellent! Your point of view tells the story well and gives me a feel that I am right in the midst of the rapids. I agree with very, very slight darkening of the shadow areas to help draw our eyes even more into the water. |
Apr 19th |
| 52 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Wonderful image. I like it very much for its tonality, color, composition, how it fits in the frame and the story it tells. Regarding suggestions for cropping, you certainly could and it still would be a wonderful image, but I like the balance of this image and the branch on the left near the frame that point up seems to just be an enhancing element that frames within the frame and helps to balance the image. My only suggestion is to get rid of the two white stops toward the top center of the sky. |
Apr 19th |
| 52 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Sharon, excellent image. You have presented this simple but majestic scene wonderfully well. I have no suggestions. |
Apr 19th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 52
|
| 64 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Thanks for the comments.....I agree about the crop. |
Apr 19th |
| 64 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Wonderful image. I like the idea. I flipped an reflective image one several years ago and so understand the entire idea and how wonderful the effect is. Did it well here, too. I have to agree, though, that white element in the lower part of the image right of center is confusing. Is there a way to get rid of it or tone it down, that is the questions. |
Apr 19th |
| 64 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
I think it is a wonderful image. It is well composed and the bird is nice and sharp. My only concern is that the clouds look added not because I compare to the original, but because they somehow look just enough tonally different to get my attention rather then just be the background you want. I bet if you added some contrast work to the clouds that would work to enhance the image. |
Apr 19th |
| 64 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Abhijeet, I like your image very much in terms of depth of field, composition and tone. While the placement of the subject is dead center, it works given the overall balance of the scene. My only thought is that image could be sharper in my opinion. Either it was slightly out of focus for the shutter speed should have gotten the job done. However, you might be able to add some clarity and sharpening in post just enough to help the image. |
Apr 19th |
| 64 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
Wonderful image. It works quite nicely, in my opinion. It has nice tonality, clarity, and balance. The shape and forms thought the image work nicely and the point of view for composition is just right in my opinion. I have no suggestions. Very Nicely done...congrats on such a wonderful image and obviously wonderful trip. |
Apr 19th |
| 64 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
I like your adventure into the realm of abstract with this natural scene. I can only say that the white peak edges are such a contrast to the rest of the image tonally, that I wonder if softening that tonally might reduce the contrast a little to make it seem less harsh. Regardless, very nice abstract. |
Apr 19th |
| 64 |
Apr 18 |
Comment |
In my opinion this show off the egret wonderfully. The detail, clarity and focus is wonderful. While I agree the shadow is seen, it doesn't bother me. What does grab my attention, for some reason, is that I feel feathering the darkness around the bird some might be a consideration. I somehow feel that it is too abrupt of a transition from the black to the wondrous light of the bird. Wonderful image. |
Apr 19th |
7 comments - 0 replies for Group 64
|
13 comments - 0 replies Total
|