|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
More than anything, this is an interesting comment. Of course "no need for photos" wouldn't stop any of us. Nothing to change in this. Nice one! |
Jan 26th |
| 39 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
I think your goal was headed more towards accenting the reflection. It might help to pull it together by cropping off half of the domes which are somewhat distracting. This is an interesting spot and can be photographed many ways if you are able to return. Do try a four or so pixel outline in white when your image entry is very dark. |
Jan 26th |
| 39 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Everything here works - contrast, details, point of view, cropping and conversion. Terrific! |
Jan 26th |
| 39 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Once again, a fascinating iPhone image. I thought there were tracks for some construction use. Seeing the other building then made sense. My son looked at it and said "elevator shaft" ( he didn't see the title). There is nothing to change. A strong graphic image! |
Jan 26th |
| 39 |
Jan 17 |
Comment |
Beautiful tonality throughout even with the sharp contrasts. It works asa whole but I do agree with Paul that the lighter area in front may not add to the image. Either darken some or crop it off. I find the hills behind the buildings are much more interesting than the foreground. Still like it both ways - photographers choice. Nice. |
Jan 26th |
| 39 |
Jan 17 |
Reply |
Thanks for the comment, Jerry. No , it wasn't IR. Another person also asked that question which is interesting. It is hard to not take a good photo of that building. |
Jan 14th |
 |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 39
|
5 comments - 1 reply Total
|
