|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
I like it. |
Apr 15th |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
You might come down even a tad more from the top. |
Apr 15th |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
They look like bones to me. |
Apr 1st |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
I tried that but the lemur blended in too much |
Apr 1st |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I don't do landscapes, so probably not much help. I would darken the rocks on the right and maybe add some texture and clarity to the water. Were you trying to smooth out the water with that shutter speed? |
Apr 1st |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Maybe just enjoying the view. I would leave more room if you have it, and get rid of the distractions around its face. |
Apr 1st |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Great portrait. I would crop from the top and left and add some more texture and clarity to the bull. |
Apr 1st |
| 90 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I love Thompson's gazelles. I would crop from the top down to minimize distractions and slightly brighten the gazelles. What a special moment. |
Apr 1st |
4 comments - 4 replies for Group 90
|
| 97 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I like breaking the rules too, like putting my eagle closer to the edge, and I like it here too. I might have given him just a touch more space. |
Apr 1st |
| 97 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Fantastic shot. I do think the oprey could benefit from a bit of brightening. It would pop, and the white breast would look whiter. |
Apr 1st |
| 97 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I completely agree with Butch and think his interpretation is stronger. Wonderful shot. |
Apr 1st |
| 97 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I think Butch has said it all. Lovely shot, but better with less distraction. |
Apr 1st |
| 97 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I, too, thought a vertical might be stronger. |
Apr 1st |
| 97 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Thanks, Butch, I appreciate the honesty. |
Apr 1st |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 97
|
9 comments - 5 replies Total
|
