|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Reply |
Thank you Steve. Wishing you and everyone here Merry Christmas. |
Dec 25th |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Thank you one and all for your comments. It really helps me to think further. One worrisome comment from Jerry will give me sleepless nights when stated that there is 'lack of sharpness' It emphasizes I need to work more hard. Thanks Jerry and all. Wishing everyone Merry Christmas. |
Dec 24th |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Great image Larry. The tones and the processing is spot on. There is good punch in this image. Just wondering if a low angle to push the fence to create a connect for land and sky would help. Ofcourse this is what I do in landscapes as the sky cut off without any element intruding its space from the land gives opportunity to bisectioning as I call it. Still fantastic image Larry. |
Dec 24th |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Nice image Steve. The place is fantastic and the tonality is great. Your eye for the subject is very good here. I wish some element was added to push this image to the next level. I note some have suggested it too. Still as such it is fine. Good light to you Steve. |
Dec 24th |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Very interesting image and you processed it well to achieve impact and punch. The square crop makes all the difference and avoids the negative space of large foreground. The monochrome conversion justifies the image and you did it so well. Good light to you Vincent. |
Dec 24th |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Very interesting image Paul. I agree with others, to stop the crop at the bricks. The inclusion of water is not harmonizing well with the top of the image. I like the tonality you derived and it makes a fine example of shapes, design and geometry. Good light to you Paul. |
Dec 24th |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Wow! this is a fabulous image. I like it. The control and details on the whites is great. Wouldn't change anything. Well done Jerry. Good light to you. |
Dec 24th |
| 39 |
Dec 21 |
Comment |
Interesting image. I like the sharpness and the reach you achieved in capturing this shot. For me the third bird makes the frame incomplete. I do not want to jump out of the frame nor ponder what is outside it. But again this is my personal opinion; maybe one would conclude it is a traditional approach. Further I note that the details on the whites are not in. But again it must be my screen. Details on whites is always a challenge. The think pixel stroke would be sufficient than the arty edge derived here. Still a good image Dave. Good light to you. |
Dec 24th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 39
|
7 comments - 1 reply Total
|
