|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 39 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Good one Larry. I feel the image needs some punch. Two options have been provided by Lance and John and agree the impact then would be much more as the tonality here is a bit compromised. You still have a very nice image. |
Oct 31st |
| 39 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Interesting one. I like it Steve and yes that bright spot on left can be cloned out. Also the base on left can be darkened a tad. |
Oct 31st |
| 39 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Interesting capture here. Agree without the stroke one cannot make out the frame edge. I note that the base is quite limited for the image. You need more space at the base. Still you have timed your exposure well. The suggestion for ps work here is most advisable and nice to see Paul's interpretation. I am sure as we move forward you will pick up the skills and enjoy the enhancements. |
Oct 31st |
| 39 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Very nice perspective and point of view. Only the top left is an issue as mentioned here. Agree the sculpture could be deepened a bit to create the difference between the elements. Always impressed with your approach using a mobile. |
Oct 31st |
| 39 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
Beautiful scenario well presented. After seeing the color, I would prefer the color and not the mono. Still the mono has its own charm. I see some white dots into the base and would prefer cloning it out. Good one Dave. |
Oct 31st |
| 39 |
Oct 19 |
Comment |
First, I feel guilty that I was not active here due to my travels. I am indebted to all here for your time and feedback. The feedback is really helpful. Just thinking that the texture was overdone and should be subdued as recommended by Paul. But I understand the feedback from David and our Guest Lance who is very kind to have reviewed my image. If not subdued I should get rid of it. Many thanks. |
Oct 31st |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 39
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|
