|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Comment |
When in doubt and when I feel that there is something in the image worth while (and there is in this one), I try a flipping of 180 degrees which I did and then cropped some off of what became the bottom. Not sure I like it better, but I've seen a lot of these flips recently and some are great. Up to the viewer, of course. This is just an fyi. |
May 14th |
 |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Comment |
Agreeing: A different POV would have improved the composition and enabled you to concentrate on the DOF.
|
May 14th |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Reply |
It's in the original. I don't recall why or how it got truncated. Should be included.
|
May 13th |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Comment |
You're right on that.
|
May 11th |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Reply |
thanks....w |
May 2nd |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Comment |
Do you like the composition? |
May 2nd |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Comment |
Doors are a popular subject, and rightly so. I just read a brief on doors and the author stressed the importance of having a primary subject (ie, getting in close and having only one subject.) I think Diana's comments are right on.
|
May 2nd |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Comment |
Gloomy, Gothic, et al.... And a model who knew how to pose for the objective. The backdrop (as per Stephen) looks real to me, but that is influenced by the costume and expression of the model. Not too black at the bottom, IMO.
|
May 2nd |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Reply |
flipped: Yes, Intermediate image.
It would have worked, as would a lot of other alternatives. My objective was to create a faux Etching. |
May 2nd |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Reply |
I think that makes it easier to appreciate your LowKey image.
|
May 2nd |
| 32 |
May 23 |
Comment |
I like.
From a "presentation standpoint" your black merges in to the basic background which is also black. You could consider a fine white border on your image in order to separate it and make the overall view less black and "less big." |
May 1st |
7 comments - 4 replies for Group 32
|
7 comments - 4 replies Total
|