Activity for User 186 - Stephen Levitas - sflevitas@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done


2719 Comments / 854 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
1 Nov 25 Comment I am always fascinated by a view of tall buildings from above because the parallel lines of their sides converge downwards. Nov 13th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 1

14 Nov 25 Comment This is a fascinating subject. I have always felt that one objective of these DD groups is to share our travel experiences, as well as discuss how we view our destinations and photograph them. Thanks for taking me to a place I have never visited.
I also very much like the jumble of antlers in your closeup finished image. I am very fond of jumble photographs myself, and often shoot them.
Nov 12th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 14

22 Nov 25 Comment Your patience with such a long time-frame project is inspiring. Your result is impressive. I will take you as an example when I consider long-term projects in the future. Nov 12th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 22

25 Nov 25 Comment Very interesting shot.
Yes, the back right square should be white.
Also, unless something strange is afoot, white's first move is weak, neglecting the center.
Nov 11th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 25

30 Nov 25 Comment In a situation like this, I suggest using both flash and natural light. Flash for the woman nearby within flash range, and natural light for the cityscape, out of flash range. I believe this is called "flash fill." Nov 11th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 30

32 Nov 25 Comment Yes, well done. Especially the detail in the snow and your choice of cropping. Nov 5th
32 Nov 25 Comment The execution is fine. The sky in the inset is good, and the treatment of the larger image is effective.
You have reversed the conventional use of an inset to give more detail, and here your inset gives the bigger picture. This so unconventional, and original I might add, that it is a bit hard to relate to.
I am not sure I want to recommend sticking to convention, but you might consider reversing the two pictures to follow the convention.
Also, I think the entire bell tower on the left might be another good choice for the detail.
Nov 5th
32 Nov 25 Comment The sky is fine, the junk is fine, and the viewpoint of the building is good. But I do not find the building at all uninteresting. I think the architecture is notable, very clean lines and very functional.
I decided to search for more information about your silver mine building. I found that it was in Burke, Idaho, not far from Spokane. Here is an article about it, and it has an area photo showing your building.
https://businessjournalnorthidaho.com/news/2024/apr/30/nibj-take-a-drive-through-history/
Nov 4th
32 Nov 25 Comment That one lifted stalking paw makes the entire picture. So interesting that such a small touch has such impact. Nov 4th
32 Nov 25 Comment You had a very good eye for the angles in the architecture. Looks like it was a cloudy day, so too bad that there were no shadows to further emphasize the angles.
We also made a tour there, quite some time ago, and it was a wonderful photo shoot day for me, with all the hulking buildings, obviously empty.
Nov 3rd
32 Nov 25 Comment Remarkably good use of the wide-angle lens.
You softened the very bright areas in your finished image, but I rather like the bright areas in the original.
Nov 3rd

6 comments - 0 replies for Group 32

33 Nov 25 Comment You have done something very unique with this image. Usually such a view would not include such a large expanse of sky. I think this was a rule to be broken by you, because it injects an emotional element of hope into the image, much as you said you are happy to see this town thriving now. Nov 11th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 33

37 Nov 25 Comment Wonderful shot. Is that Kowloon in the foreground? Nov 9th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 37

71 Nov 25 Comment Like your colleagues say, this is a great image.
I find it interesting that you altered the perspective to make the vertical lines parallel. Shooting from above, that meant your original would have converged downwards. I think that would have been fun to see, as I am a perspective wonk. Would you care to show us the original?
Nov 9th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 71

78 Nov 25 Comment Just fantastic. One of the best street scenes I have ever seen. Please enter in some really prestige contests. You have a real chance of getting an honor. Nov 9th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 78

81 Nov 25 Comment It's a nice result, especially as your colleague remarked about the trees on each end holding the image in.
But technically, please tell us how many images were stitched together, and how many degrees the panorama took in. Thanks.
Nov 9th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 81

86 Nov 25 Comment I like very much your almost surreal finished image, with its blue tones, moon, and strange lighting. It is no longer a soaring grain elevator, as shown in your original shot. It is now quite squat due to the perspective modification. You have traveled very far and successfully from the original scene. Nov 8th
86 Nov 25 Comment What a nice story. It must be her grandmother. Nov 8th
86 Nov 25 Comment I don't have anything to add about the image. I love it.
But I want to comment about Naxos. We stopped there a few years back and absolutely loved it. I hope you ate their potatoes, reputed to be the best in Greece, and maybe beyond. We lunched on fries drizzled with olive oil and oregano. Never had the equal anywhere else.
Nov 8th

3 comments - 0 replies for Group 86

88 Nov 25 Comment This is nicely done. I like quiet interior shots with history.
Since you shot only one side of the room, perhaps you did not have a wide enough lens to take it all in. One of my favorite games to play is to reflect an interior image to simulate a larger space. I did not get it exactly right, but you get the idea.
Nov 8th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 88

93 Nov 25 Comment Charming, soft, tranquil. Enjoyed looking at it for some time. Nov 6th
93 Nov 25 Comment Well done with the wide angle lens. Everything came out well, despite the variable lighting.
But what is the subject of the statue? It's your main subject.
Nov 6th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 93


22 comments - 0 replies Total


107 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 32

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

May 22

Apr 22

Mar 22

Feb 22

Jan 22

Dec 21

Nov 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Apr 19

Mar 19

Jan 19

Dec 18

Nov 18

Oct 18

Sep 18

Aug 18

Jul 18

Jun 18

May 18

Apr 18

Mar 18

Feb 18

Jan 18

Dec 17

Nov 17

Oct 17

Sep 17

Aug 17

Jul 17

Jun 17

May 17

Apr 17

Mar 17

Feb 17

Jan 17

Close this Tab when done