Activity for User 186 - Stephen Levitas - sflevitas@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done


2628 Comments / 841 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
1 Jan 20 Comment Hello Sol, I love these kinds of shots. I call them "Jumbles," and have been shooting them for 20 years. See my image this month in Group 32, where I posted my very first Jumble.
I think you have just the right size and number of peppers. You also have a variety of colors, shapes, and ripeness/flaws to show natural processes.
I also love the reference to the famous pepper shot by Edward Weston.
Jan 6th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 1

2 Jan 20 Comment I agree with your and your colleagues' comments. The sky is great and your angle of view makes the shot interesting.
I suggest a tiny bit of perspective alteration, as attached.
Jan 12th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 2

4 Jan 20 Comment For the purpose of your official photographer role, this is a fine record shot, showing the processing and its context in the community. Compositionally, I think a closer crop would also be nice to get in closer to the marchers, like this: Jan 3rd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 4

5 Jan 20 Comment Great shot resulting from a great effort. Good practice for shooting grandchildren. Jan 23rd
5 Jan 20 Comment I love shots of rope, twine, or any woven strands, as I am a knot hobbyist.
Yes, I think your original framing, showing more, especially a fuller view of both knitting needles, is better.
Yes, the frayed end is a great detail feature, and so is the texture of the woven strands.
How about converting this to monochrome and showing it to us--I tried, but my program failed because it "encountered an unknown JPEG marker." Sorry, I would have tried it.
Jan 4th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 5

7 Jan 20 Comment Great shot, as everyone has said. I like the original framing because I like a lot of natural space around the human element in nature--just a personal preference. Jan 23rd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 7

8 Jan 20 Comment I have a lot of good reactions to this shot. I like the angle best of all--it could not be better with all the right angles viewed from a diagonal point of view. It makes me think of the angles on Frank Lloyd Wright's "Falling Water" house in Pennsylvania.
I find the modern rain spouts interesting to see in an adobe building, as well as hints of finished windows and a balcony.
But I don't think the cat is needed.
Jan 7th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 8

11 Jan 20 Comment Also, consider a flip. Jan 2nd
11 Jan 20 Comment Yes, I think there is a great shot here. Here is my suggested crop. How about swapping out the sky using one of the post-processing tools that does that well? Jan 2nd

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 11

16 Jan 20 Comment Looks great to me. I shoot with a G10--wonderful compact and very capable camera. Complete controls if you want them, but still fits in a pocket. Jan 22nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 16

17 Jan 20 Comment I love shots with lots of black, and this is a dramatic one. I did not see this location when I visited there, so thanks for the shot.
A few months ago, one of our colleagues talked about reflecting and doubling an architectural shot when a good view could only be obtained on one side. So here is something I decided to play with, attached.
Jan 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 17

23 Jan 20 Comment Adelet really nailed the artistic origins of this style--Andy Warhol. See the attached sample of the MM images she refers to. Your technique is very compelling. I really like the way the four images came out. Jan 22nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 23

26 Jan 20 Comment Worth mentioning here is a technique shown once by one of our colleagues in another group: when shooting an architecturally symmetric scene, and one half is imperfect (crowds, lighting, obstructed view, construction, etc.), take the good half, copy and flip it and attach the flipped copy to the original good half. Presto, a good shot. You can also do this with a half-shot to make it look like a whole shot. I showed this technique this month in Group 17 on Sheldon Wecker's interior shot. Jan 22nd
26 Jan 20 Comment Are the images reversed? The "original" looks like the finished images.
That's my downtown! I live a couple of blocks outside downtown Bethesda. I could walk to this spot in 20 minutes or drive there in 5. Le Pain Quotidien restaurant is excellent.
Jan 3rd
26 Jan 20 Comment Nice shot. I love architectural shots empty of people. I rotated it right .95 degrees. Jan 2nd

3 comments - 0 replies for Group 26

27 Jan 20 Comment Congratulations on your excellent control of the saturation. Your image looks natural and lovely. Way too many shots of fall colors and sunsets are overdone in post-processing. Jan 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 27

28 Jan 20 Comment Both images are very beautiful. It would be interesting to see the images as taken, to understand how much you post-processed them. Can you show them?
But I do suggest a bit less post-processing, because both image announce "I am post-processed," and I think it would be better if the viewer does not see that in an image. Pardon me if I am mistaken about that--it is how it looks to me on my monitor.
Jan 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 28

29 Jan 20 Comment Hi Bill, I tried to do perspective adjustment in PS Elements using "perspective" and also rotated the image left 1.5 degrees to level it. See the attached. I did not work on other aspects. But I want to point out that the radical alteration of proportions in your image shows up in the unnaturally thin gondolier in front of the building. Best to remove the man and boat if you choose to keep the altered proportions. The proportions you rendered are not bad looking, but not true to the original architecture. Jan 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 29

30 Jan 20 Comment You folks are having a great and instructive discussion about this image. It's rare that the photographer can go right back and try again. I'm in Monochrome Group 32, so this is a very interesting shot for me.
You might consider that the top half of your original is a separate composition, like this:
Jan 12th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 30

31 Jan 20 Comment Too many roadside character shots simply show "interesting" faces. I think you have avoided that, to show something of this woman's hard life--essential in my view when shooting in another land.
She might be blind in the other eye, and her twisted mouth may suggest she is a stroke survivor. Her head-covering is of plain cotton.
Jan 22nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 31

32 Jan 20 Reply Great idea! Jan 27th
32 Jan 20 Comment Thanks to everyone for their comments. I just love the "Woo Hoo" name suggestion from Larry, and Tom's coloring suggestion. Thanks also to Bob for the contrast work. And to Diana for reminding me that I can manipulate a scene before I shoot it. Jan 27th
32 Jan 20 Reply Thanks for visiting, Ata. I shot this in ÇeÅŸme, Turkey town center in a market basket outside a souvenir shop. Jan 25th
32 Jan 20 Comment Everyone is spot on with their comments above. I agree 100%. Very pleasing shot, particularly the necks. And the original cropping is just right. Jan 22nd
32 Jan 20 Reply Thanks for visiting, Bob. I had tried it myself and got this. I like the increased contrast. Jan 15th
32 Jan 20 Comment Everything is sharp, and the framing is fine, but I don't get anything from the subject matter (I don't care for glamour shots), nor any real personality from the model. The pose is fine, and the curves under the paper an interesting concept. Jan 6th
32 Jan 20 Comment Looks great to me, and a good story about the subject. I am sure someone can help you with getting rid of the extra car's fender--I hear about "content-aware" modification all the time, although I don't use it.
How about the tech data? I always want to know the lens focal length and the distance you stood from the subject. Thanks.
Jan 6th
32 Jan 20 Comment Michael, I just can't get a good sense of organization and central subject on this one. It must have been an interesting visit for you, but I probably would have shot over the shoulder of the artist to include his painting. For me the best I can figure is to contrast the artist intent on his painting against the cafe people totally oblivious to him. Like this: Jan 5th
32 Jan 20 Reply You nailed it, Larry. That's so much fun. Thanks. Jan 3rd
32 Jan 20 Comment I like the conversion to monochrome, getting rid of the distracting and unimportant (to me) dark green of the leaves. (Interesting that Tom has just done that in his image this month, getting rid of bright red objects.)
But I don't care for the second out-of-focus partial blossom--is that what I see?
Jan 2nd
32 Jan 20 Comment Good idea to get rid of distracting bright colors by switching to monochrome. I will save up the lesson. This is so helpful. Jan 2nd

7 comments - 4 replies for Group 32

34 Jan 20 Comment Fun shot. See also folk dancers this month by Hema Narayanan in Group 81. Jan 18th
34 Jan 20 Comment Good job getting rid of the junk on the water's surface, but I liked the trash in the bottom of the boat, the number on the side, and the context among the other activity at the marina.
The dock is hard to understand, because it now looks vertical--I prefer its original perspective.
The color work is great--you could present this to the owner with a proposal to sand and paint their boat to this level of beauty--but it might be just a bit too bright.
Jan 12th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 34

35 Jan 20 Comment This is a captivating composition that makes me want to keep looking at it.
It is full of symbolism: the tree is new life springing from a difficult rocky spot. Since this building may be (once) a church, and new life is often discussed in church (both physical and spiritual), a tree of new life doubly resonates here. The stone steps lead up to a mysterious and difficult door--to what--to new life, eternal redemption, an ordinary mass or meeting? The stone steps are an improvise stairway, instead of a normal wood stair--must we build our own stairway to heaven out of stones we carry with difficulty, and climb with effort? On and on. Great composition.
Jan 22nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 35

39 Jan 20 Comment Thank you for the useful instruction about lighting. Very useful. I like your colleagues' comments about blurring the skin a bit.
I am uncomfortable with the slightly parted lips, as (to me) they add an emotional note not consistent with the rest of the face.
Jan 2nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 39

42 Jan 20 Comment In spite of your several colleagues suggesting some cropping, I will give a reason to consider keeping the current view. The relationship between nature and humans (especially in Asian art) is often portrayed as the human element occupying a very small place in the grandness of nature. I think your image expresses that very well--the grandeur of the lake has expanded in flood to overwhelm the human objects. Perhaps it is gentle, and will subside, and the human element will be permitted to re-assume its presence beside the lake. Jan 21st

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 42

43 Jan 20 Comment Hello Harley, I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32, so your monochrome shot interested me. I quite like the composition of objects, and combination of chicken eggs with and without shells.
Overall, I find it a bit too light, whereas your color original had (to me) deeper and better shadows.
I am not concerned about possible phallic symbolism--it may even be artistically appropriate when shooting eggs.
The large Emu egg, however, appears to me to be ever so slightly tilted to the right--what do you think?
Jan 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 43

44 Jan 20 Comment Good job on handling the light, both inside and outside.
I adjusted the perspective using PS Elements "Skew," just making one motion to pull the left bottom corner further to the left.
Jan 20th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 44

45 Jan 20 Comment Per Phyllis's comment, placing the pieces is an opportunity. Say, in a logically impossible or improbable position--to see if anyone notices. Jan 14th
45 Jan 20 Comment Thank you for showing me the Taipei I do not know (since I was there in 1988-89). This is a wonderful shot. Jan 14th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 45

46 Jan 20 Comment Nice shot. Please tell us your camera settings and post-processing, if any--and the story of getting the shot. Jan 14th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 46

50 Jan 20 Comment Nice action shot. See also another rugby shot this month by Miriam Power in Group 53. Jan 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 50

53 Jan 20 Comment Good action shot and a good discussion. See also Karl Hokanson's two rugby shots this month in Groups 50 and 59. Jan 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 53

58 Jan 20 Reply Right you are, Issac, of course. The rotation was completely new to me--such a good idea! Jan 23rd
58 Jan 20 Reply Thanks for showing us this variation of an excellent composition, making a very interesting alternative. I always thought only of cropping, and only rotated to straighten horizon lines--but the idea of rotating to introduce diagonal lines is new to me. Thanks for the instruction. Jan 18th

0 comments - 2 replies for Group 58

59 Jan 20 Comment Nice shot of an unconfusing action moment. I prefer this crop of five facing one, emphasizing the title, "Oh Oh".
See also another rugby shot this month by Miriam Power in Group 53.
Jan 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 59

60 Jan 20 Comment I love shots like this--piles of small objects. This one is great, as folks have observed, especially showing the letters and numbers. I have been shooting such "Jumbles," as I call them, for over 20 years. Please come visit my Jumble this month in Group 32. Jan 13th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 60

64 Jan 20 Comment Looks like a Frank Gehry building? Jan 7th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 64

67 Jan 20 Comment I have lots of comments on this one, Larry.
First of all, thanks for the lesson on spot metering. Very clear.
Second, how does "finger roll" work exactly? When I want to be careful about vibration, I press down on the shutter release with my forefinger, and simultaneously up with my thumb from below.
All your other choices look great, and a great story of course.
But most important of all--how did you persuade the bird to stand still through all of your activity, especially wading into its watery domain?
Jan 2nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 67

73 Jan 20 Comment Very will done. In the cinematic world, this is sometimes called "Day for Night." Reference the 1973 François Truffaut French film released in the USA under that name. Jan 13th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 73

74 Jan 20 Comment Merhaba Ata,
Your colleague has given you a good comment for this interesting shot. On my part, I would like to hear the story of how you took it. In particular, I would also like to know if the potters make all those identical pots free-hand or if the have a template or shaping tool to get them all the same size and shape. Thanks.
Jan 20th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 74

78 Jan 20 Comment Yes, you gave good a good reason for the angle, and it was an informative explanation. I agree with Terry's comments about the overall composition. Jan 6th
78 Jan 20 Comment Very nice backlight.
I rotated it 4 degrees to the right.
Jan 3rd

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 78

81 Jan 20 Comment Nice shot. See also folk dancers this month is Group 34 by Steve Estill. Jan 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 81

87 Jan 20 Comment Very nice shot, and very good idea to express the Yin/Yang. In the Yin/Yang symbols there is an opposite color dot in the center of each element, suggesting that each concept contains within it a seed of the opposite. In your image, on the bright left side, there is a single dark pine, and on the darker right side there is a white tree trunk in the very center. So you have expressed Yin/Yang very deeply. Jan 13th
87 Jan 20 Comment Congratulations on this very delicate shot. It is especially nice to see that the sunrise color is not overdone in post-processing! Jan 13th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 87

90 Jan 20 Comment This is a great composition. What was the lens focal length and how far were you standing from the bow?
I am in Monochrome Group 32, so always on the lookout for good monochrome compositions. Here is you shot with a bit of adjustments to taste for brightness and contrast, and a touch of sharpening.
Jan 13th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 90

92 Jan 20 Comment Is it a rainy day? Is that their problem? Jan 7th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 92


52 comments - 6 replies Total


103 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 32

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

May 22

Apr 22

Mar 22

Feb 22

Jan 22

Dec 21

Nov 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Apr 19

Mar 19

Jan 19

Dec 18

Nov 18

Oct 18

Sep 18

Aug 18

Jul 18

Jun 18

May 18

Apr 18

Mar 18

Feb 18

Jan 18

Dec 17

Nov 17

Oct 17

Sep 17

Aug 17

Jul 17

Jun 17

May 17

Apr 17

Mar 17

Feb 17

Jan 17

Close this Tab when done