Activity for User 186 - Stephen Levitas - sflevitas@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done


2676 Comments / 847 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
18 Nov 18 Reply A happy club, Tom! Sometimes, this is all fun. Nov 12th
18 Nov 18 Comment Connection? There is the obvious connection that the beetle is looking for its home planet circling the star Betelgeuse. Nov 12th

1 comment - 1 reply for Group 18

19 Nov 18 Reply I very much like architectural images like this, empty of people, communicating solitude or calm, so yours is very successful. On a personal note, all of my ancestors would have come through Ellis Island (although I hope not through the hospital), three grand-parents, and two great-grand-parents. Nov 13th
19 Nov 18 Comment Norm, following on Tracy's and Stan's excellent analytic comments, I would like to ask if you gave any forethought to your exact shooting position? Reading the perspectives on the frames of the windows, it looks like you are standing exactly opposite the left edge of the chair. Also, is the chair shot as found, or did you place it? Nov 12th

1 comment - 1 reply for Group 19

20 Nov 18 Comment This is a fascinating follow-on to the story of Zeus in the form of a swan, raping Leda. Evidently, the result of that fertilization was an egg, from which a full-grown Leda springs anew, mixing in elements of the rebirth of the Phoenix, or of Minerva springing fully armored from her father's forehead. All that is nicely present in your composition. Congratulations. Only two photographic suggestions. I think she should be barefoot, at least, and I would suggest you not be hesitant to make her nude. Nov 12th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 20

24 Nov 18 Comment Jim, Kim's text about bees has been duplicated under Donna's image of a female model. Nov 2nd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 24

32 Nov 18 Comment I like the color version also. Is it possible to use post-processing to add fog that swirls around the tower? Nov 30th
32 Nov 18 Reply Thanks for the specific hints, Diana. I think I will take a little time on this one and work on all of those; then bring it back to the group in a future month. It's funny how I have been looking over old images recently and seeing new things in them. Nov 24th
32 Nov 18 Comment I have seen a lot of balloon shots, because my wife is Turkish and we travel there every summer, and the Cappadocia region there is a tourist ballooning center. When you have a dozen colorful balloons in one shot in the morning sunlight, then I think color works. But in your case, especially expressing the mountains as the main subject, and using a single balloon as a small accent, I think monochrome works much better. The small size of the balloon relative to the mountains maintains the proper relationship between the grandeur of the mountains and the diminutive scale of the human hand in nature. Having seen the shot with the balloon, somehow the shot without it seems empty. Very nicely composed. Nov 15th
32 Nov 18 Comment Hi Jennifer, I can't comment on the technical questions you asked--I am sure the other will. But I like the composition and I think the 25% sepia toning works very well. That's a hint I will remember. On my monitor, this image seems a bit too bright overall. Nov 12th
32 Nov 18 Reply Hi Larry, I wish I could say I planned the shutter speed to blur the hammer, but that was just fortune, because I shot that in automatic mode. That's a great point to remember for such shots. Nov 11th
32 Nov 18 Reply Thanks for visiting and your kind comment, Beverly. Nov 11th
32 Nov 18 Comment Ha ha. I just took my two local grand-kids to the exact same thing, but indoors. I prefer the color version because the flesh tones separate the child more from the rocks. As far as the pose goes, if you have another visit, try for shooting the child on their descent, as they push away from the wall and "rappel" down--you might be able to catch their face if you stand near the bottom of the wall. Nov 9th
32 Nov 18 Comment Striking combination of rectilinear architecture and the curved stair path. I am sure this unique combination got you your award. I will remember the lesson--thanks.
I prefer the mono by far. I find the green in the color shot "ordinary," but none of that in the mono.
Nov 9th

5 comments - 3 replies for Group 32

36 Nov 18 Comment Such a nice shot with great sharpness. It may also look OK in monochrome (I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32). Here it my try at it. Nov 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 36

37 Nov 18 Comment My wife and I visit Seattle often, as two of our three grown children live there. Your shot almost takes in their neighborhoods in Beacon Hill and West Seattle. Just a few months ago, another DD group member shot from Kerry Park. My question about this lovely shot is to ask the focal length of the lens you used--I am guessing it is a long lens because it looks like Mr. Rainier has been brought in quite close. Nov 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 37

38 Nov 18 Comment This is a truly fascinating travel/cultural image for me. In spite of visiting India three times, and many visits to our friend's Hindu temple in the USA, I have never seen anything like this. Please tell us more: is this a temporary display, and why was it made of tea artifacts--is that uncommon? Thank you. Nov 16th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 38

42 Nov 18 Comment Hi James, I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32. You got really great light on this, as you hoped--very successful. Just for discussion, here it is in monochrome. Nov 19th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 42

43 Nov 18 Comment Hi Connie, I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32. What a fine image, perfectly convening the bitter cold. I have lived in Syracuse and Albany, NY, and Minneapolis, MN, so I am acquainted with the cold. It was often -20 when I shoveled out our family driveway as a teen. Just for discussion, here is your image in monochrome. Nov 19th
43 Nov 18 Comment Hi Toni, I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32. You got a great shot of daily life here, with great depth of field to show all the details of the surroundings. The only comment I have is that it perhaps has a look of being a bit over-sharpened in post-processing. But if you did not do that, then it's just how it displays on my monitor. Nov 19th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 43

45 Nov 18 Comment This is a very attractive autumn shot, and it's a nice story that it is a place you visit often. I like the wide-angle point of view. I especially like that you got a shot with the fallen leaves across the surface of the pond--that adds another layer to the view of sky&trees, reflections of sky&trees, and finally the surface of the pond. Nov 25th
45 Nov 18 Comment Hello Friends, I am visiting from Group 32, and would like to comment on Ray's image because I happen to love such shots of piles of stuff and shoot a lot of these, which I call "Jumbles."
Charlie, there is no focal point in a Jumble image; it's all about covering the plane of the image with a partly randomized pattern.
However, there is a subtle force involved in a Jumble image. All the objects in the image have been arranged by that force. It is Gravity; it arranges them; and it keeps them level; it is actually a subject of discussion in such an image.
Nov 19th
45 Nov 18 Comment Cindy, Richard's "original" is accidentally a copy of Vince's. Nov 3rd

3 comments - 0 replies for Group 45

46 Nov 18 Comment The picturesque little boat is named The Maid of the Mists. Nov 19th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 46

47 Nov 18 Comment This is a nicely composed shot, and so are the variations the group is discussing. I would like to add that this is in the genre of a portrait of a person without the person present. We can learn from the worn chaps that the missing rider is very experienced. They are right-handed. The saddle and tack are in good condition. I presume others can tell from the tack if it is in good order and well-arranged. What else can one tell about this rider, and what else might such an image contain to tell that story? Nov 20th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 47

48 Nov 18 Reply Turned the car off! What a great hint to remember. Thanks. Nov 21st
48 Nov 18 Reply No, no, the image is great as is. Your really succeeded to get all the lights and darks looking good. I won't make the December meeting--thanks for mentioning--you are very thoughtful. Nov 21st
48 Nov 18 Comment Hi Margaret, it's Steve from NIHCC. Great idea for a family shot. How about straightening the verticals a bit? Nov 21st

1 comment - 2 replies for Group 48

49 Nov 18 Comment I love it when we hear such a great story, and a human one in this case, about an image. This adds so much to the Camera Club experience. Nov 21st

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 49

51 Nov 18 Comment Hi Jerry, I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32. This is a striking and bleak perspective shot, all the better for lack of any human figure or focal point, so strongly emphasizing emptiness. It would also work well in monochrome--see the attached sample for discussion. Nov 21st
51 Nov 18 Comment Dave, Pamela's "original" is accidentally a copy of Lynne's. Nov 3rd

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 51

52 Nov 18 Comment This is a wonderful shot of lightning, but the discussion is about birds and a Great Egret and white on white??? Nov 3rd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 52

53 Nov 18 Comment Great shot. Brenda said to try it in monochrome, so here is a simple conversion. I like it both ways. Take your pick. Monochrome tends to "feel" sharper. Nov 21st
53 Nov 18 Comment Now it's become a beautiful abstract pattern. So I went to town with it, for fun. Nov 21st
53 Nov 18 Reply Thank you, Tom. Nov 21st
53 Nov 18 Comment Here is another shot at bringing out more detail in the shadows, without handling the sky separately. I used the following PS Elements controls: lighten shadows, darken highlights, brightness, and contrast. Nov 21st

3 comments - 1 reply for Group 53

58 Nov 18 Comment Merhaba, Hassan. I love your Sultanahmet cafe shot. My wife is Turkish and we have been there many times. It captures the street scene very well, both inside and outside the cafe. Although it may be distracting to some, the table cloth is typical. So is the coffee cup (tea is served in a tall clear tea-glass with a flared rim to grip). Your group colleague, Deborah, had excellent ideas about adding clues to the shot. Have you ever had your fortune told in the coffee grinds afterwards? Nov 24th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 58

61 Nov 18 Reply That's a good reason to leave the nipple ring. And, yes, the careful posing shows. Thanks for the additional story about working with the model.
Nov 5th
61 Nov 18 Comment You did a really great job on this. I particularly liked that you arranged and studied the lighting, and then told us about it--a very good lesson. And your goal of showing the musculature looks very successful. I like the angle of the raised hand.
My only comments are that the model appears to have a nipple ring that does not fit the composition, to my mind. Also, I see you very carefully arranged for 90 degrees between the outside of the horizontal arm and the inside of the vertical arm, and included the face line in the vertical line--very precise! I wonder how it would look if there were 90 degrees between the outside of both arms--just my thought.
Nov 3rd

1 comment - 1 reply for Group 61

62 Nov 18 Comment This is a stunning night shot, and very improved in b/w. Here is a cousin of it shot by the Maryland photographer, A. Aubrey Bodine, in 1949. Got to his official website, http://www.aaubreybodine.com/ and in the image ID input box, choose image number 31-042. Nov 3rd

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 62

64 Nov 18 Comment I can't comment more on the photograph, but it would be nice if someone would tell the story of how the rock forms like that. Is it volcanic cooling? What governs the hexagonal shapes? Nov 25th
64 Nov 18 Comment Stan raises an interesting point, noticing that the camera is aiming up, but the perspective adjustment says otherwise. I would like to point out that sometimes the original apparent tilt-back perspective is OK, because that is what your eye actually sees, even if our brains adjust that in our heads. Nov 25th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 64

67 Nov 18 Reply Another difference that I have read about in Eastern art is that the scale of humans in a natural scene is quite small, reflecting a proportion between the grand scale of nature and we humans. Nov 27th
67 Nov 18 Comment See another bull elk this month in group 69, by Donna Brok. Nov 26th
67 Nov 18 Reply Sorry I was not clear. I checked with my wife. The Turkish words are "peri baca," which literally means "fairy chimney." The Turkish is pronounced "pehr-ee bah-jah." Nov 26th
67 Nov 18 Comment Hi, Larry. Lovely shots, both. Thanks for reminding me of my visit there in the 60s when I was at college in Binghamton. Nov 26th
67 Nov 18 Comment Wonderful shot, and it has been really interesting to read through your discussions about shooting outdoors.
Just a note, I did not know the term "hoodoo." In Cappadocia, in Turkey (my wife's country), the translated name for such eroded formations is "fairy chimneys."
Nov 26th
67 Nov 18 Comment With all due respect, I would like to advocate for images with no specific focal point. I think a scene like this expresses tranquility and beauty. You may not please judges like that, but I think you can please yourself very much. Nov 25th
67 Nov 18 Comment Ohhhh, now that I have heard how memorable the stop was for you, more possibilities are emerging. To tell the story of the cleaning lady taking a break with the daily paper, don't crop at all, keep the broom, keep the bananas, keep the clutter on the table, and lighten up the room to show her context, and tell THAT story--it's also a good one. Nov 25th
67 Nov 18 Comment This is a really interesting shot and process you described, to find an interesting picture in an old picture. The silhouette is very good, and it looks like your subject is studying a map of where she will soon hike. It looks like she is in the open air!
Perhaps you should take out the flies, the lumps on the table, and her mop handle?
Nov 3rd

6 comments - 2 replies for Group 67

69 Nov 18 Comment See another bull elk this month in group 67, by Richard Matheny. Nov 26th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 69

71 Nov 18 Comment Just as an alternative, I think the extensive blue sky above allows the sun to be so striking against it. I would not cut out any of that sky. Nov 27th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 71

72 Nov 18 Comment Hi, I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32. You got a great shot of the bear. Here it is in monochrome, for discussion if you wish. Nov 27th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 72

73 Nov 18 Reply Yes, Sherry, that's exactly right, the monochrome is moodier, or starker; just the nature of monochrome. Good case study of the differences. Nov 29th
73 Nov 18 Comment Hi, I am visiting from Monochrome Group 32. Since it was in the discussion by Tuhin, here it is, with just a touch of contrast adjustment. I agree with him, that it also works fine in monochrome. It's a great shot. Nov 27th

1 comment - 1 reply for Group 73

74 Nov 18 Comment David, this is a great shot, and your narrative was a pleasure to read through--it is positively the best narrative I have seen all year in the DD groups! Thanks so much. Nov 27th
74 Nov 18 Comment Fine shot of your summer home town. My wife and I vacation across the water in Turkey, her country, every summer. Is your town in the Greek or Turkish sector?
About the perspective. Professional architectural photographers will straighten perspective for presentation, but the lean is actually what your eye sees, and the camera is true to that. So a little lean is just fine if you like that.
Nov 27th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 74

76 Nov 18 Comment Jay, this is a charming and successful image. In particular, I think you resisted any temptation to overdo the post-processing. As a result, it looks just great and completely natural. Nov 5th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 76

78 Nov 18 Comment Just visiting, and I am inexperienced with the technique used to make this very impressive image. I see the exposure was 1/4, and so I think I understand the camera was panned, blurring the background and track, and giving a fairly sharp image of the bike. But I don't understand where the "wizz lines" came from, nor what looks like a ghost image of the bike. Was there a flash at the end of the 1/4 second to freeze the bike? Can you break the technique down for me? Thanks so much. Nov 28th
78 Nov 18 Comment Me too, your group had a great discussion about this image, and all the approaches are interesting.
For reference about a solid line down the middle see the attached painting by Gustave Caillebotte: Paris Street: Rainy Day, which I think is the grand-parent of all paintings and photos so divided.
Nov 28th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 78

81 Nov 18 Comment Beautiful shot. Angela is right about including the hand. I have been in Group 32 for ten years, and one of the first things I learned from my more experienced colleagues is to always include the hands, at least in the taken image.
Also, is it almost possible to see your image reflected in this little boy's eyes?
Nov 29th
81 Nov 18 Comment Beautiful shot. Colin's remark reminds me of a Rachael Carson quote, something like this: "We sat out on our porch [at their Maine summer house] last night and looked at the full moon. You know, if you wait long enough, you can see a goose fly across the face of the full moon." So keep up waiting for the bird to appear--Rachael Carson says you will be rewarded. Nov 29th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 81


50 comments - 12 replies Total


105 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 32

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

May 22

Apr 22

Mar 22

Feb 22

Jan 22

Dec 21

Nov 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Apr 19

Mar 19

Jan 19

Dec 18

Nov 18

Oct 18

Sep 18

Aug 18

Jul 18

Jun 18

May 18

Apr 18

Mar 18

Feb 18

Jan 18

Dec 17

Nov 17

Oct 17

Sep 17

Aug 17

Jul 17

Jun 17

May 17

Apr 17

Mar 17

Feb 17

Jan 17

Close this Tab when done