|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
Thank you, Don. |
Nov 29th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
Thank you, Adi. |
Nov 29th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
Thank you, Lance. |
Nov 12th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
Thank you, Lance. |
Nov 12th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Hi Clark,
I really appreciate the concept you have presented.
The clouds' reflections on the mirrored panels are beautiful!
I agree, the modern budling is swallowing the church. But a bit more of the lower portion of the buildings (especially the church) might improve the viewers perception of the relationship between these buildings. |
Nov 7th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
The subtlety captured in this image is very pleasant. I like the grain, too.
The fog is real! It seems to have obliterated blackness.
When choosing double exposure, does it matter which image is taken first? Does the first image have dominance? |
Nov 7th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Reply |
Thank you, Michael! |
Nov 7th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Don,
I agree this is an impressively awesome image. Thank you for sharing it!
In addition to the lighting, the textures on the car and ground are great!
|
Nov 7th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
The reflection is lovely.
The leaves at the very top of the tree draw my eye away a bit, though. |
Nov 7th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
This is an interesting image, Michael.
All eyes are looking front. But, I am curious about what might be around the bend on the right.
What attracted you? |
Nov 7th |
| 83 |
Nov 24 |
Comment |
Hi Michel,
This is a nice capture. Great detail!
Since it has the border to keep eyes within the image, I was wondering if eliminating one pillar and opening one side might enhance appreciation (Attached). Just a thought. That may not agree with your vision. |
Nov 7th |
 |
6 comments - 5 replies for Group 83
|
6 comments - 5 replies Total
|
