|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 32 |
Mar 18 |
Comment |
The image in mono is very good. Good tones and great detail.
The effect is interesting, although I personally would prefer it to be a little softer, but it is a matter of taste.
|
Mar 23rd |
| 32 |
Mar 18 |
Comment |
It's a good street shot. I agree that it would clarify the shadows of the background and then make a vignette to concentrate the image.
It would also darken the chair on the left side and lighten the character's face so that the view is concentrated there.
|
Mar 23rd |
| 32 |
Mar 18 |
Comment |
The processing you've done gives the image an attractive look.
However, I find very dark areas with no detail in the foliage and, in
proportion to the framing, the old shed is too large, occupying practically the
entire photographic frame. I would have preferred it a Little more proportionate. |
Mar 23rd |
| 32 |
Mar 18 |
Comment |
In the mono version the bird has good detail and better contrast than in the
color version, except the right wing that is very dark, almost without detail.
I agree with the halo around the wings in the mono version.
The remains of vegetation are less annoying in the color version.
In both versions, the pose of the bird is very interesting. |
Mar 23rd |
| 32 |
Mar 18 |
Comment |
The mono portrait is much better.
The lighting in the mono version highlights the cheekbones and eyes, which
are very attractive. And the background is dissembled.
In mono you should have better luck. |
Mar 23rd |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 32
|
5 comments - 0 replies Total
|
