|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Reply |
Thanks! |
Jun 19th |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Reply |
Thanks! |
Jun 19th |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Comment |
A very beautiful bleeding heart image. I think the crop works well but the buds hanging above the flower, which look good in the original, look funky in the final due to over processing. The main flower shows a bit of that as well. Best to always use the feathering when masking. |
Jun 18th |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Comment |
I like the softness and the layered lines. I. would suggest darkening the bright white area in the upper left some. Ideally. I would like to see the tip of the petal on the lower left but that probably was not int he frame (unless you cropped it out) so cropping it a bit more would work as Carol suggested. Overall a nice photo with lovely colors and DOF. |
Jun 18th |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Reply |
Good suggestion Thanks! |
Jun 18th |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Comment |
I love the colors of both the flower and background. They compliment each other so well. The flower is beautiful. I think I would like to see the top of the left flower angled a little more towards the viewer to see more of it if possible. It's picky but I would clean up a few little extraneous spots like the 2 white spots by the right flower and the small black spots on the petal of the left flower. Nice find! I don't think I have these weeds in Nebraska! |
Jun 6th |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Comment |
This is very beautiful. You have captured a lot of detail too. I think to capture a reflection in the droplet you would also need a light to shine on the flower that then reflects back, at least when I have tried it. But outside there may be a natural light if everything is positioned right to capture that. I agree with Stuart's comments. |
Jun 6th |
| 95 |
Jun 24 |
Comment |
I haven't used that feature much. I tried it on a flower image and couldn't see much difference. On my camera it combines the photos into one image, I don't think I can separate them. I will play with it again. Thanks for the suggestion |
Jun 6th |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 95
|
5 comments - 3 replies Total
|
