|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Reply |
I like your closer crop. Thank you. I may go back and try again. Another angle focusing on the steps might be better. |
Jun 10th |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Comment |
Fantastic abstract! I love the lettering "is on". I wouldn't change a thing. Reminds me of psychedelic images from the 60s. Very creative and brings a smile and, I'm sure, plenty of interesting conversations. |
Jun 8th |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Comment |
What a great shot! Makes me laugh, and hold my nose! Very cute story. Your recrop is wonderful. I like that you kept the side of the woman and the entire fish logo on the jacket. It is very clever how it points to your cute 'soulmate'. |
Jun 8th |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Comment |
What a sweet and very special image. Nice, bright colors and crisp details. The steering wheel bothers my eye, but it could be removed. You have a beautiful piece of history.
Off-topic, someone parked a Slingshot in town and I had no idea what it was. For those unfamiliar, here's my snapshot. What a car! |
Jun 8th |
 |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Comment |
Lovely image! You certainly were in the right place at the right time. Your edits were subtle and nice. The bubbly sand leads the eye, and the view is incredible. As you look around the image there is much to see-- details of tiny tracks. I don't see any changes needed. I believe a 'squeak' less than Laurie's horizon might be beneficial; but, also, I could see this as a strong abstract with no horizon or people. Nicely done. |
Jun 8th |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Comment |
You got alot of really nice details in this closeup, especially in the puff. If you keep the color, I'd only reduce the greens. I've had issues with yellows/greens in some yellow flower shots. Not sure why. It may be the 'auto' setting which chooses white balance. Settings allowing choice of white balance might help. I haven't tried it. I'd rotate the image placing the dying flower at bottom right. I tried some "Noir" filters (Snapseed) where you increase/decrease the 'wash' and force the grasses more of view, but as the artist you may not like the mono look. |
Jun 8th |
 |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Comment |
Backlit flowers are spectacular. I like converting to BW to see what effects I can get, but I prefer your original. The BW can work-- You might pull more details back into the center and in some petals which is where I believe the strength lies in the image. |
Jun 8th |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Reply |
Thank you. As I mentioned to Laurie, I tried to add another rock but couldn't get it quite right. I think you are correct, a rock would be better in that space and I will revisit the idea. It can be added with various programs. I like the tools in the Snapseed and Photo Editor apps so I'll start there. |
Jun 8th |
| 86 |
Jun 19 |
Reply |
Thanks-- I'm just now viewing this on a larger monitor, and the double exposure in that corner needs work. I started out adding a rock but gave up because I had trouble making it natural looking. I might go back and try it again. Sometimes less is more, and I think I may be trying to keep too much in the scene. |
Jun 8th |
6 comments - 3 replies for Group 86
|
6 comments - 3 replies Total
|
