|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Thanks. That's giving me more ideas to play with. At some stage I guess I'll hae to do the kangaroo shot :) |
Feb 11th |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Very similar to what Mervyn is suggesting so will have to give it a shot |
Feb 11th |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Thanks. I'll have to give this a try |
Feb 11th |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
I love the way this image looks & have no suggestions for improvement. |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
I do like the colours & patterns in this image. I do wonder what it was like in the lower left of the image as I like the rough edges in the upper left hand side & thinking that it could be similar in the lower left hand side. Do you have a slightly more zoomed out version? |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
I love this duck's expression & the detail in him. What is he quacking about? I was wondering about the foreground & the fact that it is ice does make it more interesting. |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
I do like the way that this pops out at me. I like the way that my eye travels around the image. The only thing I'm wondering is if the stigma? could've been a fraction sharper. Bit I do love the way that the light plays in this image. |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Comment |
Initially it struck me as a grainy image. But the more I look at her the more I like her. I like being able to see more details like the whiskers. Whilst the original does give more story as to where she is the branches on the right hand side are distracting so I do like the tight crop. |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Hi Dean. Thank you. I'm looking forward to learning more from everyone in the group. |
Feb 3rd |
| 69 |
Feb 24 |
Reply |
Hi Pierre. This is a very shallow water system with a maximum depth of around 2 metres. I could have a play to see if I could obscure the lake bottom. No I did not use a polariser on that lens. |
Feb 3rd |
5 comments - 5 replies for Group 69
|
5 comments - 5 replies Total
|
