|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 26 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
The final effect is appealing. However, the image is so strong, in terms of composition and story telling, that I wonder if this is an improvement compared to the original. This is my bias, but I prefer a picture closer to reality and with strong colors (which I'm sure you have in the original). |
Jul 12th |
| 26 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
I like the composition as it is (no need to crop), although I would recover the tones of the bottom and top-right leaves. I prefer the B&W version, not only because the color one has some strange tones, but because it's more powerful. |
Jul 9th |
| 26 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
I agree with keeping the distortion and the B&W treatment. I also agree with removing the distracting letters on the pavement and the cars. Although initially I didn't notice it, the bicycle is a nice anchor point for the image. It might be my monitor, but I would prefer a little more contrast. It's true that the branch on the top left is distracting, but I don't see how you can remove it without too much work. |
Jul 9th |
| 26 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
You are right that this is a very standard view of the waterfalls, so the color version would have rendered the typical tourist photo. Converting it to B&W makes it different and more appealing. Beyond the nice composition provided by the triangle formed by the falls, I like that you nicely captured the rising steam. The sky complements the background, and the tones look right on the money. |
Jul 9th |
| 26 |
Jul 21 |
Comment |
After reading your explanation, I looked carefully looking for duplicate elements to discover the cloning; but I couldn't notice anyone, kudos! I like everything you achieved with this photo: mood, composition, tonalities; and I wouldn't change anything. My only comment is whether you really needed the droplets for the final image, but they were already there. |
Jul 9th |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 26
|
5 comments - 0 replies Total
|