|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 5 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Outstanding! The Brookside exhibit was well done years ago. Let me know how it is when you visit! |
Apr 17th |
| 5 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Pete! Nice image and yes, I shot the Brookside Butterfly exhibit YEARS AGO! And now it is open again. Just for informations sake, there is also a famous Butterfly Exhibit in Key West Florida that is comparable to Brookside. Thanks for sharing this image-well done! |
Apr 13th |
1 comment - 1 reply for Group 5
|
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Thanks Sheldon, I'll play with that item and see how it affects the overall image. |
Apr 16th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Well I must admit it was a love-hate relationship! Grin! |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Henry, nice conversion given the original! It is unfortunate that sometimes we just can't get a clean shot of our subject. I don't know if there was more aqueduct to the right but if there was I would try a hand held horizontal pano and then stitch in software and then you might have isolated better. But we all know when we travel we face limitations. Like it otherwise as a nice documentary piece-what craftsmanship to be still standing! |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Hey Charles, just simply warmed my heart! I'm originally from that area and still remark about the lakeshore and river scenes during the winter-thanks for posting.
I like the lighting you did of the tree to really make it jump at the viewer visually and of course great clean up in post. I can feel that cold nip from here... |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Hey Nenette, I agree with the others in that the original composition has some key features that really balance the left side of the image. Cars are fine, but remove buildings and yes, the snow contrast is a little off. I like the comment from Charles on the desaturate... |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Hey Sheldon, great geometry and perspective; very unique! I agree with Charles that different exposures would have held the light back from the windows. Otherwise I really like it! |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Hey Murphy, another vote for the original composition. I think it is very dynamic and the shapes and light take your eye up into the top window than back...The horizontal crop seems less so because you give more visual weight to the window than the nice swirls leading into it as you have in the original. Another way to articulate this is the original crop engages the viewer better. And it would pop if done in black and white... |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Nicely done Peter. Always a difficult shot with no additional light also! Looking at the face of the boxer you captured makes me imagine what the other boxer's face looks like! |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Hey Henry, indeed it does. The contrasts one can see and capture in that country are endless. I was very glad I took the effort to make sure we had access to the interior of this Church as it's not a common image from that region. |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Murphy, the vantage point was available and as Charles mentioned, sometimes it is not and a straight on composition is the best available. I also mentally remarked on that rug in the color version-it is a bit informal. It might reflect that a family takes care of this church and museum on site and finds might be limited. The color image does have a character all its own... |
Apr 13th |
| 11 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Hey Charles, Thank you. I was fortunate in that the light was somewhat oblique at that time of day and thus it coursed across the composition. I did shoot different exposures and combined several to hold back that window scene-that was my goal as I deliberated the scene! |
Apr 13th |
7 comments - 4 replies for Group 11
|
8 comments - 5 replies Total
|
