|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Comment |
Thanks, Frans. Yes, I see what you mean. More contrast may help, but in general it is not as sharp as yours. Thank you for your comment. |
Sep 20th |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Reply |
Thank you. I went back and checked. 9 o'clock in the am.
|
Sep 12th |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Reply |
Sometimes it works great on my Canon, and sometimes not. Love it when it does. |
Sep 12th |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Comment |
Really cute image. I wonder if you could have used less than 1/4000 ss so that you could get your ISO down. I'm always trying to find a way to get my ISO down since I live in the woods. Shows a lot of personality. |
Sep 12th |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Comment |
Beautiful! I love the softness presented with the wavy background and soft light. Can you talk about your process a little? |
Sep 12th |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Comment |
I never noticed how the yellow eyes and legs work together. Nice! I agree that it looks a little bright. Was Matthew right with the mid-day guess? |
Sep 12th |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Comment |
Nice shot. I haven't seen one of these yet, and I'd love to. Did you use bird eye focus on this shot? |
Sep 12th |
| 90 |
Sep 23 |
Reply |
Thank you, Ginny. Interesting to see which one people like better - this or the original. This was taken with my Canon R7 and 100-500 lens. 1/1250 ss, 472 mm, f 7.1, and 6400 ISO because of the deep brush. |
Sep 12th |
5 comments - 3 replies for Group 90
|
5 comments - 3 replies Total
|
