|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Reply |
Wow, I really like this version, Peter!! |
May 15th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Reply |
Thanks so much for your answer, Tom... very interesting!
|
May 15th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Reply |
Sometimes I hate that auto correct!! Now I understand...would be interesting to know why icue won't come up right... let's see if it does here... SO... not here, either!! |
May 14th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Comment |
Hey Mike... not heavy handed at all... I just wasn't sure if you intended to leave the coloration for a more magical effect or not... since you seemed to indicate that it was not intentional, I took the liberty of selecting the lambs (rather hastily, going to hue/saturation, selecting first yellow and then the red color, then reducing the saturation on them. It worked fairly well. Not sure if you want to try that, since no one else seemed to notice...but anyway, here is the result. |
May 9th |
 |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Comment |
Very nice piece, JoAnn, but I am inclined to agree with the boys on the black lines. Perhaps somehow toning them down and/or reducing their effect on the flowers themselves? |
May 9th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Comment |
Wow, Peter, this is a real eye-popper! I'm not sophisticate enough to follow your process, but it certainly is an effective one. I also like the 2nd stage just as much as the finished product, and think they both are winners. The colors are just phenomenal! |
May 9th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Reply |
Hi JoAnn... just wondered what 'icue effect' means? |
May 9th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Comment |
So Very lovely, Mike, beautiful and ethereal. I'm just wondering if the colors green and pink show up in the sheep's wool in your version? Is that effect something you wanted? |
May 9th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Comment |
If they don't buy this post card, Mark, they don't recognize talent and beauty. |
May 8th |
| 18 |
May 17 |
Comment |
Wonderful action shot, as noted by the others in the group. The way the man in the sidecar is leaning, and the visible expressions of both men certainly lends to the excitement of the image. I am inclined to agree with Mike about the presence of the back two riders... your intent on leaving them in was a good one, but for my eye, I do find that since there is little separation, they complicate the image a bit too much. Either way, it is a wonderful image. |
May 8th |
6 comments - 4 replies for Group 18
|
6 comments - 4 replies Total
|
