|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 32 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Not much to add. I like it a lot, it has nice leading lines. |
Apr 7th |
| 32 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
This is a really fun image. I agree that the glasses isn't a good fit but I don't mind the shirt. |
Apr 7th |
| 32 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
This is really interesting subject. Edited your final image and added some head room using content aware fill in Photoshop. And, I burned the really bright areas a bit. And I added a little more vignette, but my vignette might be a little heavy handed. |
Apr 7th |
 |
| 32 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I totally love this. It looks like some of the stuff I like to shoot. Only one suggestion, I would brighten the eyes as I have done in this small section. |
Apr 7th |
 |
| 32 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Very nice image as usual. I'm so sorry to hear about your diagnosis. I certainly wish you the best of luck and keep hanging in there. I will hold you in my thoughts, |
Apr 7th |
| 32 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
OK here is an image that has lots of green in it. This is the second role of film. And for this one I went for the 'high end' processing. Now that you point it out I do still see a tiny bit of green bleeding into the background in spots. |
Apr 7th |
 |
| 32 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
I'll try that. A lot of people like the super contrast.
The bloom is probably from cheap processing. I was just testing the camera. I've taken more with good processing and they look much better. I can post a good photo from the new and better processing if you like. |
Apr 6th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 32
|
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Reply |
Opening the shadows is a great idea but it wouldn't look natural. It was very dark and you couldn't see to walk around there. It was a moonless night and away from city lights. So I tried to open up the shadows a bit and I think the image kind of falls apart. What do you think? |
Apr 9th |
 |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I really like this image, but I really fell in love with the background so I removed the trees in the foreground, increased the clarity and de-haze and added a little vignette. Of course this makes it a whole different image but we don't have much fog around here and I find it appealing myself. |
Apr 7th |
 |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
What Sunil said... |
Apr 7th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
An interesting shot. I really can't see any difference between the original and the final version. |
Apr 7th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
I live the lines and I love taking photos like this. I do think you got a little too aggressive with recusing the intensity of the highlights. I edited your original and pulled the highlights down just enough so that that there are no blown out pixels. |
Apr 7th |
 |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Nice image. I love these infrared images. The only thing that bugs me about them is that vegetation shows up white. I think infrared works best for scenes without vegetation like desert rocks and cities. |
Apr 7th |
| 78 |
Apr 26 |
Comment |
Very nice! I really don't have much to add or suggest. |
Apr 7th |
6 comments - 1 reply for Group 78
|
11 comments - 3 replies Total
|
