|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 32 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I really like your aesthetic. This is just the kind of thing that I really like to shoot. I noticed that the sky where you removed the bushes on the right doesn't match the rest of the sky. So I re-edited the image. This is just a quick edit. I got rid of the bushes with content aware fill plus the clone stamp and did a lot of dodging and burning. What do you think? |
Sep 15th |
 |
| 32 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I love the lighting. The only thing I could suggest is to brighten and sharpen the eyes. Nice photo! |
Sep 15th |
| 32 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I've never seen one of these animals. I understand people keep them as pets.
I re-edited you photo increasing the clarity and contrast and darkened the background. I also fixed some highlights that were blown out. What do you think? |
Sep 15th |
 |
| 32 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Very nice photo. I took out the far shore line with content aware fill. This brings back the original aspect ratio and allows for more of the water plume to be seen. What do you think? |
Sep 15th |
 |
| 32 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I had to think about this one for a while. I'm not crazy about it myself but it is totally original for sure. If I were shooting this I would get really close to the spheres and do a self portrait with me and the camera reflected and then do a landscape scene as reflected with the distortion.
Here is an example illustrating what I'm talking about. |
Sep 15th |
 |
| 32 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
Great suggestion and I did just that, I brought the yellow in the flowers back.
As for more sky, I have several versions of this scene made with different lenses. I have some with much more sky.
|
Sep 15th |
 |
5 comments - 1 reply for Group 32
|
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Thanks for the suggestions about the background. Actually of the two images I made of this scene this was my least favorite. Here's the 'better' version of this image. What do you think about this one?
I know all about sky replacement. I don't use it that often.
|
Sep 15th |
 |
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
That's just amazing. I think this is the nicest image I have ever seen in either of the two discussion groups in which I am a member. I like the starburst effect. |
Sep 15th |
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
That's really cool! It makes me think about how land vertebrate animals evolved from fish and how long ago that was, |
Sep 15th |
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
I think you are on the right track but a little more practice would be helpful.
Since we are showing Motion Blur photos, here is one I did recently which is the opposite - the rider is blurred. This is with an 8mm circular fisheye and was made in a tunnel along a bike trail.
|
Sep 15th |
 |
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Reply |
I really like this one. |
Sep 15th |
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Wow that's just amazing. I've been to Boston a few times and have never seen this. I like the person in the image for scale. The red instantly draws your attention. I really like how you have intensified the dramatic effects in the sky.
However, when I was in a PSA local club, photos of other people's art were usually disqualified. I think that is a dumb rule. |
Sep 15th |
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
Very cool image. What a great idea!!!! As soon as I saw it I knew exactly how you did it so now I want to try some images like this. What I would have done is also blur the background seen through the escalator glass sides except not where the escalator in the back shows through. Does that make sense? Anyway I would do it to your image but it would require a lot of work. |
Sep 15th |
| 78 |
Sep 25 |
Comment |
This is a nice image. You focus stacked this the hard way. I personally use Zerene stacking software. I think the way Robert rotated the image 90 degrees clockwise makes it more effective. |
Sep 15th |
7 comments - 1 reply for Group 78
|
12 comments - 2 replies Total
|
