|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Diana and Barbara, yes I agree, won't do well in a salon or exhibition, I probably won't submit it anyway. It's just a moment preserved for myself. |
Jun 22nd |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
I'd crop the trees from the right and to above the faces from the top. Maybe a liitle more contrast may add to the atmosphere. Somehow I do not hink it is something I would submit for a competition.
|
Jun 11th |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Yes, Diana, this one is for me, I don't think it will have any chance in a competition, or even in a LRPS panel!
|
Jun 11th |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
As it stands, I agree that the color is more pleasing to the eye. Maybe a sepia tinted mono can keeo the warmth. Worth a try?
|
Jun 10th |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Thank You |
Jun 10th |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Reply |
Thanks so much |
Jun 3rd |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Reply |
That's good to know, I'm planning to try a few still lifes, so will keep focus stacking in mind. |
Jun 1st |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Nice and interesting composition. Maybe pull back the highlights a bit is all I can suggest. Sice it is a still subject why not use f/16 or f/22, may not need focus stacking. |
Jun 1st |
| 32 |
Jun 23 |
Comment |
Yes he emerged after a rest across the field, in better light as well |
Jun 1st |
 |
7 comments - 2 replies for Group 32
|
7 comments - 2 replies Total
|
