|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Interesting crop. I agree about sharper ground. |
Apr 29th |
| 16 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Interesting landscape with colorful flowers. With respect to all comments I like Darlene's crop the most - position of green hill, less sky. But color processing I like Walters the most.
|
Apr 29th |
| 16 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Joan, you have captured an interesting scene. I would prefer a little more crop on the right and less then Terry. I would place the man on 1/3.
Your processing is good, just a little too much yellow for me.
|
Apr 29th |
| 16 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Renee, you have made a beautiful architectural image. Yes, perspective corrections are necessary. You have corrected blown areas good. Mohanan's idea of coloring is interesting. But the corrected version has blown out lights. They were better at your processed image. |
Apr 29th |
| 16 |
Apr 23 |
Comment |
Nice portrait of traditionally dressed girl. I agree with Terry about red tones.
Face is really a little bit soft. Have you tried without noise reduction? I never make it at ISO 100 if I haven't done too much tone corrections before (shadows/highlights, levels).
|
Apr 29th |
| 16 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
I know, that smaller aperture would give more DOF. But 1/320 is the limit value for handheld with such zoom. Increasing ISO thoroughly decrease the image quality at this compact camera.
|
Apr 29th |
| 16 |
Apr 23 |
Reply |
Thank you for all the comments! Focus stacking is practically impossible with live insects. They move all the time thus making the image blurred. |
Apr 29th |
5 comments - 2 replies for Group 16
|
5 comments - 2 replies Total
|