|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
I like your flowers. Lightening, processing and sharpness are good. I agree with Bunny's crop, just a little less on the right. At capturing (or in processing) I would also shorten the lower stem. |
Nov 21st |
| 16 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
It's nice to meet deer in a forest. Due to low light mobile perhaps used long shutter. You couldn't hold it steady enough. Beside that the deer was moving. Perhaps you used also digital zoom. From unsharp original you can't make a sharp image. It's really just a memory. |
Nov 20th |
| 16 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
I also like photographing grebes. Image is good lighted and perfectly sharp. Crop can be a little bit different, but for me, it couldn't swim out of the image. Look at my suggestion. |
Nov 20th |
 |
| 16 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
Nice, calm landscape.
I agree with Jack about brightness and contrast. Mohanan's version is a little bit too strong for me.
With cropping you have got a little bit strange format, not 3:4 or 2:3. I would keep 2:3 just cutting from downside to get 2/3 of sky.
|
Nov 20th |
| 16 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
I like your scene and reflections in calm water. I miss some more sky. I would prefer color version, just a little bit more saturated then original.
I know camera FZ200. It's not fixed zoom lens. It's quite an usual compact camera with 24x zoom. It just doesn't have exchangable lenses.
Although hand held capturing you didn't need 1/2000s. It would be better to lower ISO to 100 and use 1/800s. Higher ISO at these cameras decrease quality of photo a lot.
|
Nov 20th |
| 16 |
Nov 20 |
Comment |
I agree: an interesting scene. The middle Landscape part is oversaturated, while the shadow of cloud is much too dark. I can't find explanation for a blurred mist around the roof. |
Nov 20th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 16
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|