|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Interesting image and processing. I miss some shadows from the original. |
Aug 22nd |
| 16 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Walter, you have got a nice shot of chicks.
Processing is for me a little bit too strong. Perhaps too much contrast, doesn't matter, how you have got it.
I'm afraid, that such strong vignette would not be acceptable for ND. |
Aug 22nd |
| 16 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Interesting and colorful building. I like your processing of colors in building. I agree with Mohanan about the sky.
I would exchange the crop of the image. There are too many waves on the water to see a clear reflection. In such case I don't suggest to include all the reflections with horizon on the middle. I would cut a half of reflections putting horizon on 1/3 and include all the sky. |
Aug 22nd |
| 16 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Interesting travel shot and perfect processing. I like more vivid colors then original.
About vignette. It's not permitted in Travel division, because the image looses it's natural lookout.
|
Aug 22nd |
| 16 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Yes, a peaceful image. I would just make panoramic crop, to leave long lines. I would crop more then a half of grass and nothing else. |
Aug 22nd |
| 16 |
Aug 20 |
Comment |
Thank you all for nice comments! I wish you to visit once Slovenia and see some of the beauties of our country.
Really, sometimes some elements in the photo are distracting. In PID sections there's the easiest way to clone it out. But in Travel division it is not allowed. I like to process photos so, that they can be entered in both divisions.
There's also another possibility to make such elements less distracting. It's burning them to less draw the eyes from the subject. So your comments are welcome. Cutting the building out would move the church to much to the edge out of 2/3.
|
Aug 19th |
6 comments - 0 replies for Group 16
|
6 comments - 0 replies Total
|