|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 16 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
Realy a colorful image. I agree with Walter to make a tighter crop. I would make a little bit less then he. And I would make a little bit less highlighting, because on the processed image there are some areas overexposed.
|
Jul 23rd |
| 16 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
Yes, it's hard to capture image in such low light. Can you mount your iPad on tripod for such long shuters? I like your more saturated colors, but dots on the sky show overprocessing. And as long I look at the image, original and both processing are not sharp enough. I's mostly seen on the rocks. But original is darker and smaller and the blurred rocks are not so much seen. I beleive, that Cannon's photo on trimpod is much sharper but needs more processing. |
Jul 23rd |
| 16 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
This bridge is really huge. It's not easy to imagine. I also prefere bw image. But composition of the original image seems better to me. You have cropped too much sky on the top. And on the original image pillars are more on the third of the image. Now it seems to be too central. From original I would crop just the lower distraction, perhaps a part of your ship. I also prefere to see the ship under the bridge to have comparison to the dimensions. |
Jul 23rd |
| 16 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
First, you have made a perfect original image. Perfectly sharp, blurred background and fine color combination. Also te processing including vignetting is good. The only thing, that I would modify a little bit is crop. The flower is now central and the butterfly gives too much weight to the left side. I would crop out on the right and on the bottom. In that case, you Will also get a diagonal. |
Jul 23rd |
| 16 |
Jul 17 |
Comment |
Interesting processing. I would try to convert the imate to bw and remove some noise on the sky. |
Jul 23rd |
5 comments - 0 replies for Group 16
|
5 comments - 0 replies Total
|