|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Thank you for the good thought. I agree with you. In reality it is 8-12ft tall |
Jan 30th |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
I would say this is as close to perfect as a picture can get.
I am not a fan of odd crops but this works! More so,The house, the bridge and the people are small enough not to compete on the main subject yet present enough to exist.
Well done ! |
Jan 13th |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Well I have to agree with you M.
There is a contradiction between the leaves and the water. And yes the ultra wide angle of view (145 degrees aprox.) is distorting reality beyond the ability to identify true distance and size. As for the Exposure - once the water is measured correct, meaning as it was there and then - I did not touch the ret.
|
Jan 13th |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Thx |
Jan 13th |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
hi, the fix a ND filter upside down darkening the pool.
I am ok with this being burnt out of details as this is the reality of the scene. |
Jan 13th |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Bill, This is a masterful edit and a great shot. For me, once major elements are removed out or added, or, background is altered, the final result does not reflect the reality the camera captured. At that point I would not call it a picture but a digital art work. On the other hand, there are other opinions too :). Either way - great job ! |
Jan 13th |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Larry,
this image has the potential of a magazine cover. Very well executed. My thoughts:
1. The white balance is too yellow in my opinion, to the point the water is red.
2. Try tilting the horizon to the right a bit.
3. The bright leaves in the water are in the same axis as the water and competing for the attention of the viewer.
|
Jan 13th |
| 36 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Very nice image indeed !!!!!. The fall colors are great.
I do have 2 thoughts for you:
1. The edit of the sky and darkening the clouds affected the trees on the left and it is strongly visible.
2. On the right hand side trees, on the branches, - there is a chromatic aberration of a zoom lens, or a color fragmentation resulted of HDR / Low contrast treatment.
|
Jan 13th |
4 comments - 4 replies for Group 36
|
| 83 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Good thought. Ill try it ! |
Jan 30th |
| 83 |
Jan 26 |
Reply |
Thank you |
Jan 30th |
| 83 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
This is a very beautiful picture. The layers, textures, and exposure are well executed. I do have 2 recommendations:
1. Reduce the clarity / dehaze slider a bit.
2. Shift a bit the histogram to the right to increase the dynamic range and have white tones. |
Jan 13th |
| 83 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Hi Hana,
this is a very compelling work. For me once the background is removed this is not a picture any longer. For me a picture and this is a picture as long as it reflecting reality as it was taken by the camera. On the hand, there are opinions too :).
|
Jan 13th |
| 83 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Elise, This is a nice composition and honestly I would not touch anything.
I love the leading line in the center and the frame around the subject. |
Jan 13th |
| 83 |
Jan 26 |
Comment |
Hi Bill,
This is a nice composition, texture and subject. My only comment is the white spot on the top right hand side. I recommend you darkening this area and brightening the main corridor area.
|
Jan 13th |
4 comments - 2 replies for Group 83
|
8 comments - 6 replies Total
|
