|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Yes, I see. This is a touch one, especially with that long tail on the right. |
Dec 30th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
I like seeing this progression with improvements based on our group suggestions! The final picture made me say "Wow!" Very nice.
*Seeing you have "a bit of a go at it" makes me chuckle as I love to watch Bluey with my granddaughters. And even without them. Great cartoon! |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
A very nice image! It did look very dark on my laptop until I increased my screen's brightness and then it was perfect. I guess reviewing digitals versus paper prints can be very different. |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
I agree with the others. Not sure how you added layers for a fog effect. I'm not familiar with this technique. Maybe softening the edges would look better here?
It is brilliant, but nature can be very vivid, so that does not bother me. |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
Very nice buck. I agree with editing to distinguish the subject from the background. I also like to add a little catchlight in post and I think that might add some definition to the eyes here. |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
I do like the B&W conversion here. I did not notice the power lines, either, but the white light at the lake's edge was a little distracting for me. |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Comment |
I like this! I do agree having a little more space on the left would be nice. Great capture! |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Thanks! |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Agree. Thanks! |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Pierre - Funny how I wasn't at 600mm and didn't even notice. Probably did not zoom in after tracking the eagle circling with the prey. Still so much to remember for each shot! I do agree this shot could have turned out better with more appropriate setting. Thanks! |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Thanks! |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
I tried Topaz a few years ago and had tech issues with it on my Mac. Topaz had not answer and told me to contact Adobe (!). So I've been reluctant to try it again, but it's likely a better product now. Thanks! |
Dec 27th |
| 69 |
Dec 24 |
Reply |
Yes, that makes sense. Thanks. |
Dec 27th |
6 comments - 7 replies for Group 69
|
6 comments - 7 replies Total
|
