|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Comment |
I agree with the other comments. Cool shot. Nothing else to add. |
Mar 11th |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Reply |
Yes, an improvement by toning down the highlights. I really wanted to show the fins of the fish and that is why I opted for such a tight crop. But I like Pierre's crop also. Thanks! |
Mar 11th |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Reply |
Thanks! Very good suggestions and thank you for editing an example for me. I like it very much! |
Mar 11th |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Comment |
I agree with Dean. Love the brilliant colors and the backlit beak. Not a common sight here in Ohio! So glad you shared. |
Mar 6th |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Comment |
Love it! I prefer the dark buffalo. Overall superb shot! |
Mar 6th |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Comment |
Brilliant colors! At first I noticed noise in the butterfly's wings, but not the flower. Maybe the wings just have that sort of texture. This is a beautiful shot! |
Mar 6th |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Comment |
I definitely prefer the sepia edit. A difficult crop. The density at the top bothers me, but to crop that out is to crop out a well-defined bird. Since this is not for a contest, I'd try content-aware editing and move that top bird down. |
Mar 6th |
| 69 |
Mar 24 |
Comment |
I agree! The definition of the muscles is amazing. I also like the curve of the outstretched neck. Great depth of field. |
Mar 6th |
6 comments - 2 replies for Group 69
|
6 comments - 2 replies Total
|