Activity for User 163 - Bev Caine - bevandstu@gmail.com

avatar
Avatar

Close this Tab when done


2925 Comments / 679 Replies Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group Round C/R Comment Date Image
1 Jun 22 Comment It is so easy. Go to Mariealtenburg.com take a look at her textures. It involves basically a cut and paste process with a little fine tuning. If you get hooked, email me and I'll walk you through it once or twice Jun 16th
1 Jun 22 Comment The main subject is beautiful but I find that all the greenery is a bit distracting. So I decided to play with textures and came up with the attached. What do you think? Jun 15th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 1

2 Jun 22 Comment Fabulous result. The sky makes the image a winner for me Jun 15th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 2

3 Jun 22 Comment I was going to comment on the orange in the background and then saw Luann's suggestion which I think is right on. Jun 15th
3 Jun 22 Comment Extremely well done. Gives the viewer a moment to reflect on the tragedy of war. Jun 15th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 3

5 Jun 22 Comment You are so creative. Jun 15th
5 Jun 22 Comment Lovely image of happiness. I like David's improvement. Jun 15th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 5

6 Jun 22 Comment I agree with the previous comments as well. I found that although I very much liked the flower it didn't really "grab" me. So I took it into photoshop - image -adjust-vibrance. I adjusted the vibrance and saturation and then went to sharpen - smart sharpen and played with those sliders a bit and came up with the attached. Jun 17th
6 Jun 22 Comment Excellent result. If you really enjoy flower shooting visit the website phlorography. You'll see some fabulous work there and get some great ideas.

Jun 17th
6 Jun 22 Comment This image is gorgeous to say the least. As a Florida resident I'd love to know where this is as I'm very into shooting flowers and water lilies are a wonderful option. Jun 17th

3 comments - 0 replies for Group 6

7 Jun 22 Comment The enhancements you made really make the image stand out. Very well done. Jun 17th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 7

8 Jun 22 Comment There are times when monochrome is a hands down winner. This is one of those times. Jun 17th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 8

9 Jun 22 Reply beautiful Jun 17th
9 Jun 22 Comment Love the blue coloring. Was that natural or did you adjust to create it? Jun 17th

1 comment - 1 reply for Group 9

10 Jun 22 Reply don't hesitate to email me or call 561-752-3992 if you need any assistance. Jun 18th
10 Jun 22 Reply any time Jun 17th
10 Jun 22 Comment It's pretty but my taste leans toward a sharper result. If you would like some lessons, email me at bevandstu@gmail.com and I'll be happy to work with you or better yet, call me at 561-752-3992 I'll be home all week-end and we can talk. Jun 17th
10 Jun 22 Comment Beautiful flower. Have you ever tried working with textures? Here's an example for your consideration. Jun 17th
10 Jun 22 Comment I definitely prefer #1. I wonder if you have ever considered
using a textured background? Sometimes they offer fabulous results.
Jun 17th

3 comments - 2 replies for Group 10

12 Jun 22 Comment I'd like to steal her away but at 84 I could probably not handle more than a short time. She is absolutely a heart stealer. Jun 17th
12 Jun 22 Comment Wonderful capture. Jun 17th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 12

13 Jun 22 Comment Two words say it all LOVE IT!! Jun 17th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 13

17 Jun 22 Comment No insult to the image but I wonder.... Is that your twin brother? Jun 17th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 17

21 Jun 22 Comment The creativity behind this is beyond mind boggling. Beautifully executed as well.
Jun 17th
21 Jun 22 Comment This is so very creative. I hope that you won't mind if I steal the idea one of these days with something other than tomatoes. Wonderful result. Jun 17th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 21

27 Jun 22 Comment Flower is gorgeous...background not so. So, I decided to play with a few of my texture files and created the attached using a couple of layers. What do you think? Jun 17th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 27

48 Jun 22 Reply Thank you for taking the time to review my image and your comments. Jun 21st
48 Jun 22 Reply I didn't see the reduction in sharpness, but that's probably my vision. So, I took it back into photoshop and used the sharpen filter. Hope this is better. Jun 19th
48 Jun 22 Reply Just saw Marie's latest textures. Just posted a couple of days ago....absolutely phenomenal! Jun 14th
48 Jun 22 Comment Nice technique. Keep up the good work. Jun 14th
48 Jun 22 Comment Somehow I know I can always count on you for a winner Jun 14th
48 Jun 22 Comment Great shot. Love Tom's comments. I just purchased a pass to the Palm Beach Zoo in the hopes that I'll be encouraged to get there more often so I don't waste the money. As I can bring a guest free if anyone would like to join me when the weather cools down, just email or call and it's a date Jun 14th
48 Jun 22 Comment The image is technically correct but I'd like, as Tom said, to see something to draw attention to the water. Jun 14th
48 Jun 22 Comment I brought this into photoshop, selected the sky,then selected inverse. Opened adjustments, vibrance, and increased the saturation and vibrance just a bit. What do you think? Jun 14th
48 Jun 22 Reply Planning on entering it. June already submitted so it will probably have to wait till Sept.. Keep your fingers crossed for me Jun 5th
48 Jun 22 Reply Thanks so much. If your wife ever needs this kind of background, send her to mariealtenburg.com. Her texture assortment of textures is phenomenal. Jun 4th
48 Jun 22 Reply do you prefer the color changes I made on the flower? Jun 3rd
48 Jun 22 Reply Jun 3rd
48 Jun 22 Comment Thanks. I'll give the color change suggestion a try and post it in a day or so. As to the background, take a look at Marie Altenburg's site. I've bought a few of her textures and find that they are the backbone of all the textures I use. Jun 3rd

6 comments - 7 replies for Group 48

59 Jun 22 Comment I'll never understand judges. I had something similar that I got a 10 out of 10 a year or so ago so I submitted another from the same trip and got an 8. Go figure. Jun 21st
59 Jun 22 Comment Phenomenal capture at a minimum. Good luck in future exhibitions. Jun 18th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 59

60 Jun 22 Reply Actually I do use photoshop but being towards the end of reviewing and working on more than a dozen images, my eyes must have been deceiving me. I didn't see the line. The major problem was that your image was so close to the top it was a bit tight. What I did was increase the size of the canvas and then did a content aware fill on the blank space. I first had to copy the top round edge of the flower so I that I could paste it back in place avoid cut off appearance of that top petal and then fill the white space in sections. Jun 18th
60 Jun 22 Comment The flower is lovely. The red on the right isn't for me. So it took a few steps but I got rid of it. What do you think? Jun 18th

1 comment - 1 reply for Group 60

62 Jun 22 Reply You are most welcome. Jun 3rd
62 Jun 22 Comment Very well done. For me the vignette is the perfect finish to bring the tower into the foreground. Jun 2nd

1 comment - 1 reply for Group 62

63 Jun 22 Comment Do you have a phone number for Adobe support? They are fabulous. Jun 22nd
63 Jun 22 Comment I'm ok with the forward flower being the sharpest of the bunch but I brought it into Topaz Studio2 and increased the overall sharpness and added a bit of "punch" by increasing the vibrance just a touch. I also changed you stroke from the white to a smaller yellow one as I felt that the white was distracting. What do you think? Jun 18th
63 Jun 22 Comment One of my favorite flower photographers once said "less is more" and with this image, I think the extra greenery on the left is a bit of an overkill. On that basis, the only change I considered was to crop them out and make this a vertical image. What do you think? Jun 18th
63 Jun 22 Comment I found that huge leaf on the upper left a bit distracting from the beauty of the center of the flower so I cloned it out. I then created two additional layers and reduced the opacity of the background on both of those layers, flattened the image so that the rose still had it's original brightness and contrast. What do you think? Jun 18th

4 comments - 0 replies for Group 63

66 Jun 22 Comment Great image. I keep toying with the idea of having one of my cameras set up for IR but now being very limited in where we and how we can travel, I wonder if it's worth it. Then I see an image like this and I am re-inspired. Jun 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 66

67 Jun 22 Comment Great capture. Well done Jun 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 67

69 Jun 22 Comment Beautiful image Merv Jun 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 69

70 Jun 22 Comment Whatever improvements you have made to the out of camera image have created a spectacular image that I'd love to have in my living room. Jun 18th
70 Jun 22 Comment Whatever improvements you have made to the out of camera image have created a spectacular image that I'd love to have in my living room. Jun 18th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 70

77 Jun 22 Comment What I did was select the bowl and then selected inverse and got rid of the extraneous almost background on the right by blackening the entire thing. I then focused on the eggs and in image/adjust/vibrance enhanced the saturation and increased the vibrance. Just a few simple "fixes" that I think make a difference. What do you think? Jun 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 77

78 Jun 22 Comment When I first saw this I wondered what it is. As this bird is reasonably plentiful here in S Florida, I've seen many images of them but never one so purple. I don't know if it's in your post processing or the light but I love the color even though it's probably not something I'll ever see again. No, the few browns do not bother me. Never even saw them till I read your explanation of what was done. Lovely image. Jun 18th
78 Jun 22 Comment I do like Jason's crop as it leaves more to the imagination as to what's going on. I have never heard the term LUTs so I would welcome any input as to what that is. Overall a well-done image. Jun 18th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 78

79 Jun 22 Comment This is just beautiful. Jun 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 79

86 Jun 22 Comment Great capture. I think if you made some of the suggestions offered, you'd have a winner all the way around. Jun 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 86

89 Jun 22 Comment Following the previous comments, the only thing I am going to add is that I took it into Topaz Studio 2 and sharpened it a bit. Jun 18th
89 Jun 22 Comment Following the previous comments, the only thing I am going to add is that I took it into Topaz Studio 2 and sharpened it a bit. Jun 18th

2 comments - 0 replies for Group 89

93 Jun 22 Comment This is a great shot. My only suggestion in addition to the above would be to darken the background just enough so that the gecko stands out just a bit. I selected him, did an inverse and then toned down everything else using adjustments/brightness and lowered the prompt just a tab. What do you think? Jun 18th

1 comment - 0 replies for Group 93

94 Jun 22 Comment I did understand that but as I said I don't use Lightroom but am gradually expanding my "talents" in using Photoshop. Thanks for all the info. Jun 18th
94 Jun 22 Reply Thanks. I must have misinterpreted your comment re Topaz add-on. I have and use all of them as needed. I do not use Lightroom as I have never devoted the time to learning it. Maybe in my next life :) Jun 18th
94 Jun 22 Comment Love the image overall. Particularly like what you did with the background. I have a bunch of Topaz but I'm not familiar with the one you used. Is it a separate item or part of some other one? And, another question...did you blur the background or use an independent texture to create the background? Whatever you did works extremely well. Jun 18th

2 comments - 1 reply for Group 94


52 comments - 13 replies Total


225 Images Posted

  = Current Round   = Previous Round
Group 24

Apr 26

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22
Group 48

Apr 26

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Dec 25

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24

Dec 23

Nov 23

Oct 23

Sep 23

Aug 23

Jul 23

Jun 23

May 23

Apr 23

Mar 23

Feb 23

Jan 23

Dec 22

Nov 22

Oct 22

Sep 22

Aug 22

Jul 22

Jun 22

May 22

Apr 22

Mar 22

Feb 22

Jan 22

Dec 21

Nov 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Mar 19

Apr 19

Feb 19

Jan 19

Dec 18

Nov 18

Oct 18

Sep 18

Aug 18

Jul 18

Jun 18

May 18

Apr 18

Mar 18

Feb 18

Jan 18

Dec 17

Nov 17

Oct 17

Sep 17

Aug 17

Jul 17

Jun 17

May 17

Apr 17

Mar 17

Feb 17

Jan 17
Group 58

Mar 26

Feb 26

Jan 26

Nov 25

Oct 25

Sep 25

Aug 25

Jul 25

Jun 25

May 25

Apr 25

Mar 25

Feb 25

Jan 25

Dec 24

Nov 24

Oct 24

Sep 24

Aug 24

Jul 24

Jun 24

May 24

Apr 24

Mar 24

Feb 24

Jan 24
Group 80

Feb 22

Jan 22

Nov 21

Oct 21

Sep 21

Aug 21

Jul 21

Jun 21

May 21

Apr 21

Mar 21

Feb 21

Jan 21

Dec 20

Nov 20

Oct 20

Sep 20

Aug 20

Jul 20

Jun 20

May 20

Apr 20

Mar 20

Feb 20

Jan 20

Dec 19

Nov 19

Oct 19

Sep 19

Aug 19

Jul 19

Jun 19

May 19

Apr 19

Mar 19

Feb 19

Jan 19

Dec 18

Nov 18

Oct 18

Sep 18

Close this Tab when done