|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
I like Neil's revisions. Much better result |
Nov 17th |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
Thanks Sean. Believe it or not, I never realized it was there. So much for my powers of observation. |
Nov 17th |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
You're right. This was a grab shot at a Mauri show and was the best of I don't know how many I shot. |
Nov 17th |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
I did change the partial border bvut playing with Liquify drove me nuts so I gave that up. If I can figure out how to use puppet warp that will probably do the trick. Thanks again for your input Barbara |
Nov 14th |
 |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
Thanks Barbara. I will give it a shot. |
Nov 13th |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
The portrait is a good one but I did not care for the highlights around the hat and the side of his sleeve. I did try playing with it but was not successful in removing the white without obliterating the definition of the hat against the dark background. Something to think about? |
Nov 10th |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
What a fabulous result from an almost unusable image. Love it! |
Nov 10th |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
A lovely flower, but as is often the case with whites no detail in the petals. So...I went to my newest "toy" the detail filter in Topaz and brought out the details...your thoughts please. |
Nov 10th |
 |
| 48 |
Nov 17 |
Comment |
The composition is great but there is a lack of detail in the beautiful stone work. I brought it into photoshop and used the new detail filter I just bought from Topaz. What do you think? |
Nov 10th |
 |
9 comments - 0 replies for Group 48
|
9 comments - 0 replies Total
|