|
| Group |
Round |
C/R |
Comment |
Date |
Image |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Reply |
Thank you so much, Sheila! |
Jul 31st |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Reply |
Thank you very much, Wanda. |
Jul 10th |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Reply |
I always try to be careful with sharpening, but occasionally I may miss by a bit. I tried to get the eye looking natural, so maybe some edges got too much. Sharpening can be tricky. Oddly enough, Stuart Caine felt it needed to be run through Topaz Sharpen AI...
Thanks for your comments, they are appreciated.
|
Jul 9th |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Reply |
Thank you very much! |
Jul 9th |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Comment |
I agree with Deb about photographing parades. There is almost never a good angle, and there is always a bad background. I think you did well on this, getting low and nailing exposure and focus. |
Jul 9th |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Reply |
Thank you! |
Jul 9th |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Comment |
I recently saw a picture of what had to be this same mill for sale by a photographer at a local art fair. Not the same angle, as there was no stream in it, but it must have been the same mill. That structure going down the embankment is unmistakable. Is this a popular site? I believe that your version is better for the inclusion of the stream than this professional photographer's view. I love this kind of vintage photography. Well done. |
Jul 8th |
| 28 |
Jul 22 |
Reply |
Really? I don't see that. I do see the typical Topaz artifacting in yours, however.
Thanks for looking, and thanks for your comment. |
Jul 8th |
2 comments - 6 replies for Group 28
|
2 comments - 6 replies Total
|
